The Habsburg Empire has always fascinated me. Whenever I play Diplomacy or a computer game based on 19th century Europe, I try to play Austria-Hungary. What most appeals to me.
A list of superb choices from the Poor Man. (Although I must admit to liking pretentious Latin phrases.) However, I would like to reiterate that any such list absolutely demands.
This is how far I got into David Brooks' latest column: In weak moments, I think the best ticket for this country would be Bush-Kerry. The two men balance each other.
Congratulations to Ichiro Suzuki, who just singled up the middle to break George Sisler's 84 year old hit record. A classy guy, he took time to speak with the Sisler.
One of Yglesias's commenters nails it: Bush was at times defensive, insecure and peevish. Sometimes he almost seemed to be defending his intelligence, as when he kept insisting "I know how.
I watched it on the first floor of the college, where NBC set up cameras to interview students, before and after. I felt as nervous as before a game 7.
I give up. I'll concede that I really don't understand why the adminstration can't expand the size of the Army to meet its needs in Iraq and elsewhere. This report suggests.
Matt Yglesias writes: The South in the late nineteenth century was a region that heartily deserved to be subjected to some hostile sentiments. Nothing pissed me off more than my high.
- Flaco Jimenez, RIP
- Trump openly selling pardons; nothing to be done, says Chief Justice Balls & Strikes
- The End of the World’s Saddest Aircraft Carrier?
- Total Depravity
- July Reading List
- Will Lewis does not cast off talent lightly. He heaves it away with great force
- Trump’s tariffs are not authorized by Congress
- Censoring Our History
- Homelessness, drugs, mental illness, and social policy, or the lack thereof
- This Is What Trump Plans To Do To The White House