I think Mickey Kaus might actually be on to something. Can the terrorists both want Bush defeated and want Bush reelected? Sure, if they're different groups of terrorists. The Zarqawi.
Great story by Kos about Nader's so-far failed attempt to get on the ballot in Arizona. 90% of his signatures have come from Republicans--no surprise there. The means by which.
I've got no expectations one way or another on Thomas Frank's new book, What's the Matter With Kansas? It may be a rather vulgar Marxist oversimplification, or it may shed some.
Saturday's NYT op-eds make a interesting pairing. First, we have the always insightful and never insufferable David Brooks. His whinefest today is about how Kerry seems to be embracing what is.
The attempts to parse the comments of Administration officials to prove that they didn't technically lie are pointless, because of course the chief basis of the Administration's case was the.
It's not exactly news that Garfield is a commercial and critical bomb (and I thought Bill Murray was slumming when he did that elephant thing!) Apparently the film rights to Hi and.
With respect to my recent post on conservative vanity candidate Ralph Nader, some response to the many intelligent comments are in order. First, fine commentary from The Poor Man and Nathan Newman. In.
On Hardball last night, political grandstander, liberal media agitator and suspected socialist John Lehman suggested that part of the problem with our domestic air response was due to a "jihad against defense.
- The Kennedy Center Honors
- Laura Loomer deposition
- Supreme Court Republicans rush to destroy last vestiges of Voting Rights Act to help party in next midterms
- Sherrod!
- The End of Federal Unionism
- Reactionary frames about public health are no better than reactionary frames about politics
- Wilhoit’s law, Dobbs edition
- It’s about the Battleships You Don’t Choose
- Russia Advancing
- “Nothing has been added but sentences”