Is there any person better qualified to head the George W. Bush Institute than James Glassman?
A commenter notes that Dan Filler, while still refusing to respond directly to Paul's insolent inquires about whether he violated the privacy of his commenters, has issued a (particularly witless).
And his trademark combination of lies and bizarre sexual obsessions inflicted real damage on people. The good news is that it's not as if Breitbart & Co.'s smears would get.
There were two filibusters mounted by Republicans on Wednesday. One in involved Rand Paul and got a lot of attention, and the other was the one they were actually serious.
I wanted to say a couple things about Paul's recent string of posts in order to emphasize why what's happening here is, in fact, important. First of all, I was.
The Venezuelans are giving Chavez the full Lenin treatment: embalming, display, the whole kit and caboodle. Very exciting.
This Ta-Nehisi Coates column is, not surprisingly, great: I am trying to imagine a white president forced to show his papers at a national news conference, and coming up blank..
A familiar, but frustrating, observation was posted by cpinva in the thread below: one comment: there is no such thing as “anonymity” on the internet. never has been, never will.
- Donald the Dove ponders sending the Screaming Eagles into Cuba
- England-Argentina Game Thread
- Billionaire Derangement or Elective Affinity
- Oral History of the Blogosphere Part 15: Majikthise
- New frontiers in sanewashing
- Erik Visits an American Grave, Part 2,185
- I’ve found in you my endless war
- What would EAIAC on crystal blue persuasion meth sound like?
- ICE ordered to stop most vehicle stops
- France-Spain Thread
