Author: Scott Lemieux
This gets it right in re: GOP attempts to pretend, now that he's become indefensible, that the rot in the executive branch begins and ends with Alberto Gonzales:Presumably, the idea.
Oh, and to add to what Matt says here one interesting thing about the panel is that Rosen immediately conceded that while the quality of legal craftsmanship may be normatively.
Intriguing results from an empirical study of Crooked Timber. See, this is why they've never invited any of us; those meanness stats would go through the roof the next time.
I am in Washington D.C. this weekend for the American Constitution Society conference, so blogging from me will be sporadic for a couple days. However, for your reading pleasure I.
Scott Thomas issues a defense of his TNR Diary. The fact that he's willing to open himself up to the inevitable wingnut smear jobs does give me more confidence in.
To follow up on Matt and Ezra, another angle to run at it from is to apply the logic to the civil rights movement. If one takes the Rauch/Brownstein argument.
Adam Kotsko offers as a "thought experiment" a heighten-the-contradictions scenario that would result in the "liquidation of the Democrats." And as with all such scenarios, there are several missing links.
Remember Clarence Thomas replacing Thurgood Marshall? In case you had any doubt about whether the 2008 election is a high stakes one, Tom Goldstein has a GOP Supreme Court shortlist:As.
