Granting that is was only half-serious, the below-discussed d-squared post on Budweiser reminds me of Kelefa Sanneh's arguments about rockism. Sanneh's underlying points are often quite correct: there's no particular.
Daniel Davies really likes Budweiser.I'm not prepared to refute or defend Davies' post -- it's actually quite interesting, even if his defense of Bud is actually a refutation of anti-Budweiser.
... and pretty much every other variant of videoblogging. The glorious thing that the internet gives us is precision; I can take interest in a particular point of a post.
The annual migration of the cruise ships began this week, and along with it the entire corporate ecosystem of Juneau erupted into life. It's pissing outside -- we live in.
As a staunch Giuliani opponent, I must admit a certain grudging admiration for his decision to be explicitly pro-choice rather than adopting the High Contrarian "I'm pro-choice, but it should.
Atrios makes an interesting point with respect to my argument that pro-lifers are likely to identify certain types of abortion is particularly immoral and use that as a wedge, and.
Via Kingdaddy, this is, like, pretty awesome.
- Toward a heremeneutics of breakfast
- Taking the Temperature of the Bluegrass
- This Day in Labor History: August 3, 1931
- This joke isn’t funny anymore
- Trump inflate prices
- Murder is the sport of the elected, and you don’t need to lift a finger of your hand
- Week 28
- Last Remnants of an Imperial Machine
- The customer is always wrong
- Erik Visits an Non-American Grave, Part 1,934