Author: Scott Lemieux
Charlotte Allen would like to inform her critics that her logical and factual errors are central to her point. The only interesting thing about Allen's response is that apparently Erik's.
Shorter Pierce, Serwer, and MacGillis: Bring me the head of Wayne LaPierre.* *A note for our illiterate readers: I am not suggesting that any of these gentlemen are literally advocating.
Even though I'd generally prefer not to appoint another Republican to Defense ceteris paribus, I'm now entirely convinced that he's the best of the viable choices. By the way, did.
My bottom line: "It says something about Bork's constitutional vision that accurately restating his public views has become synonymous with the dirtiest of dirty tricks." Along similar lines, Jeffrey Toobin.
When it comes to better gun control legislation, the Second Amendment is really a minor factor. The Second Amendment can be plausibly interpreted to permit a wide range of control.
R.I.P. The Bork nomination, of course, marked a watershed moment in American politics -- American conservatives whining that there's no dirtier pool than accurately describing their ideas and their consequences,.
I'm sure I'll be returning to these essays once the movie makes it to the provinces, but until then I will note that the debate has inspired some brilliant writing.
Another deal is being floated. Let's think this through (with the caveat that the details could change): The chained-CPI Social Security cuts are terrible, terrible public policy. Now, yes, to.
