Author: Scott Lemieux
I'm not going to say that this is the most vapid column MoDo has ever written -- the competition is way too steep. But it's always worth remembering that our.
In one of the funniest law review articles ever written, Nelson Lund was not only one of a tiny handful of law professors to argue that Bush v. Gore was.
Not surprisingly, Douthat tries and fails. In this case, the Times seems to be paying for the classic Maggie Gallagher feeble, undefended tautology in somewhat more flowery prose. Another point.
Yeah, I would have never have dreamed that this title could be anything but cheap sarcasm, but here we are.
Vikram Amar has a good piece about the recent holding that Propoistion 8 is unconstitutional and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The most important point, I think, is that.
R.I.P. Only some are available free, but his reflections on living with ALS -- like most of his writing -- were terrific. You don’t need to worry about 70-528 exam.
I outline some reasons to be skeptical about whether Kennedy would be willing to cast a fifth vote to hold bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional here. At a minimum, there's.
Obviously, Krugman versus Paul Ryan isn't a fair fight, but this is nonetheless quite satisfying.