Home / Robert Farley / Sunday Evening Linkage

Sunday Evening Linkage


A bleak sun dawned today over a brutal, unforgiving world.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • bph

    The video and the tool should be next to each other. Just so you get a visual impression of the calculated effects (they did use real test footage in the Day After.)

  • Major Kong

    When I was flying B-52s at the very end of the Cold War, our targets had us hitting places that would already have been hit 3 or 4 times.

    It would have been “Aim at the middle of the big smoking crater”.

    That’s how much overkill was built into the nuclear war plans.

    • FMguru

      “Bounce the rubble” is the term I remember hearing.

    • ajay

      Presumably a more likely scenario, in the B-52 vs. Soviet air defences situation, would have been “follow the trail of smoking shot-down B-52s until you get to the target, which will probably be untouched”.

      • Major Kong

        By the time we got there we’d have been lobbing ICBMs at each other for 12 hours or so.

        Probably wouldn’t have been a whole lot of Soviet air defenses left at that point.

    • Barry Freed

      By the end of the Cold War weren’t B-52s still tasked with nuclear missions carrying cruise missiles? Probably AGM-69 SRAMs with a range of about 120 miles. Were you still carrying bombs?

      • Major Kong

        We had both. Our alert loads were 12 ALCMs on the wing pylons with 4 “crowd pleasers” in the bomb bay.

        We would have launched the ALCMs first, then dropped down to low-level to drop the gravity bombs.

        • thusbloggedanderson

          What a spooky job. Thanks for posting about it.

        • Murc

          I’m curious… would you actually have DONE it, if ordered to?

          I can see myself going to war, even though I’d probably suck at it, without significant moral objection. I like to think that if I were ordered to incinerate cities filled with civilians I’d dump the bombs in the ocean.

          I’d like to think. I have no way of knowing.

          • Major Kong

            We used to joke about turning south and making Australia the next nuclear power if the balloon went up.

            In reality we were so well trained we probably would have been halfway there before we even thought about it.

            Most scenarios assumed we’d be launching just ahead of our base getting hit and dodging mushroom clouds on our way out of the US.

            In that case we’d have probably done it just out of revenge.

          • Major Kong

            Technically all our targets were military. We didn’t deliberately target population centers.

            In reality, a lot of those military targets happened to be in or near population centers.

            Not to mention that a lot of population centers would have been downwind from the fallout.

            • Patrick

              I live in Seattle and was “relieved” to see that even 1MT in Bremerton and Bangor wouldn’t be in the immediate death zone. Of course, Boeing Field is probably a target too, not to mention the fallout.

  • Informant

    The L&O analysis is particularly interesting to me because one of the main reasons I drifted away from the show in the later seasons was that their win rate got so high. (That’s also why I was never an L&O:SVU fan — their clearance rate was so high that there was no uncertainty to the outcome.)

    • KadeKo

      I quite enjoyed the wag who concluded that, given the number of people gunned down on the L&O courthouse steps over 20 seasons, in full view of lawyers and press and often cops, it ranks as among the most dangerous places on the planet.

      • KadeKo

        (Edit: That morsel wasn’t from the linked page. I think it was at TVTropes.)

  • Murc

    Hmm. If I were home during a strike on the city center with any warhead size likely to actually be on an ICBM or in the belly of a bomber, I’d likely be fine; I’m outside even the thermal zone, and this is hilly country, which has a way of degrading the blast wave of even an airburst.

    At work I’d be dead meat. Well inside the 5 psi zone, inside a flimsy prefab office building high on a hill.

    • Response: Stop going to work.

    • Patrick

      I wonder if this didn’t have at least some effect on the decline of city centers in the 50s-70s? Before you have the total overkill of the 80s (or obvious threat reduction of the post Cold War world) it seems pretty rational to want to live/work 20 miles outside of downtown.

      Racism/white flight and freeways are all I ever see talked about in urban planning treatises but this had to have been a factor in some people’s decision making.

  • allium

    If you find The Day After too Pollyanna-ish, there’s always <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQo0BQM3OlQ&quot;Threads.

    • allium


  • NonyNony

    More on this later.

    Please. Because in your Twitter feed I read this from Max Boot:

    Point of BMD isn’t to stop all missiles–just enough to make attacker think twice.

    … and I think “WTF?” And then I see this:

    BMD still useful even if it cldn’t 100% defend from all-out Soviet ICBM strike. Cld stop N Korea

    And I wonder if I’ve fallen into a parallel universe.

  • Major Kong

    The problem with missile defense is that it can also be used offensively. That’s why it’s destabilizing.

    Hit, oh let’s say China, with a first strike and then use your missile defenses to block the handful of missiles that survive.

    That puts your opponent onto a “use ’em or lose ’em” footing.

  • liberal

    IIRC after “The Day After” came out, right-wing nutjobs pissed and moaned that it was “biased”.

    • Major Kong

      That was when they were saying “With enough shovels to go around we’ll all survive”.

      Seriously. You can’t make this shit up.

      • liberal

        What I’ve never understood about that line of thought was that you’d be in deep doo-doo even if you survived the initial blasts and any fallout, and even if there were no nuclear winter effects, because the economy would completely collapse.

        Love your handle, BTW. One of the greatest movies ever.

  • Sly

    The moment I learned that my parents, who grew up in Queens during the 40s and 50s, had to wear dog tags to school so that there might be something left after the nuclear onslaught to identify their charred remains is the same moment I learned precisely why they were so fucked up.

  • thusbloggedanderson

    I’ve really been enjoying the destruction of various Mississippi cities with varying sizes of nuclear warhead. Thanks for wasting my morning, LGM.

    Now to figure out my ex’s address in Seattle!

    • Chester Allman

      Go with the Tsar Bomba and you won’t need to worry about the address!

      I’ve been playing around with it too. It’s interesting to see how vast the difference in effect is between the proverbial “suitcase nuke” and the kind they stick on the pointy end of an ICBM.

      • thusbloggedanderson

        I’m struck by how the more primitive weapons seem to be dirtier in terms of radiation, compared to their physical blast.

        Or is it just that the more modern weapons are more destructive, so that their respective radii more or less match up?

        • Major Kong

          I would say it’s the latter.

          The modern weapons can be delivered a lot more accurately so they don’t need as much yield to do the job.

          The older weapons worked on the “close counts” principle.

  • stevo67

    I don’t give St. Ronnie a lot of props because he was wrong on so many things, but he was right to attempt real nuclear disarmament with the Soviets. We still have too many of the damn things, but compared to the ten thousand plus warheads both the US and USSR had in their arsenals at the height of the Cold War, real progress was made during the talks in Iceland.

    Thank you for your service, MajorK, if the worst day ever did happen, I would not have envied you or your crew’s decision.

It is main inner container footer text