Home / General / Court Rejects Argument That Only Hetersoexuals Are Impartial Enough to Judge Equal Protection Cases

Court Rejects Argument That Only Hetersoexuals Are Impartial Enough to Judge Equal Protection Cases

Comments
/
/
/
971 Views

Fortunately, the idea that Judge Walker should recuse himself has been treated with the seriousness it deserves.

Ed “But he even lives near San Fransisco!” Whelan doesn’t like the ruling. I look forward to his post arguing that it was inappropriate for the majority in yesterday’s securities litigation ruling not to recuse themselves.    I mean, how can it be appropriate for wealthy men to have heard the case?   Do we know that  any members of the majority won’t eventually retire and judge corporate boards that will want to form subsidiary corporations so that they can lie to their customers with legal immunity?   I don’t see how they can be impartial; we need some poor, badly-connected people appointed to the Court so that we can have a truly impartial ruling.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
It is main inner container footer text