grand strategy
Source: https://www.militaryaerospace.com/computers/article/14211788/gaming-artificial-intelligence-ai-nuanced-communications The normie national-security advisors who dominated the first Trump administration needed a way to make Trump's semi-coherent ramblings legible to the global foreign-policy community. Their answer was "Great.
Image by Firdavs Kulolov, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons Foreign Affairs ran an "expert poll" on the question of whether "NATO enlargement was a mistake." Someone decided, for reasons that I expect.
Last night I accidentally watched the bulk of the GOP national security debate. There was certainly a degree of entertainment value, and there's something to be said for being part.
I think Matt misses the truly insidious follow through of this: I’ve been struck over the past three or four years by how many different Chinese people have expressed to.
You don't say. "Some nations have strategic oil reserves. Some keep grain reserves. China has both, and something others have somehow overlooked: a national pork reserve." China is releasing a portion.
My WPR column this week is on grand strategy and muddling. In fact, there is no simple dichotomy opposing grand strategy and muddling through. The world is complex, and grand.
In light of growing disquiet about Chinese intentions and capabilities in the Pacific among US security types, it's worth taking note of this fairly alarmist Russian analysis: This brings [Aleksandr] Khramchikhin back.
