Supreme Court
Not surprisingly--given that it's charged with the task of defending a law that is indefensible under current doctrine--there are many bad elements to Kennedy's opinion besides its egregious sexism and.
Constitutional scholar Cass Sunstein had a column in yesterday's L.A. Times focusing on Justice Ginsburg's dissent in Gonzales. The dissent, unlike the Court's abortion jurisprudence, focused on the right to.
I'm frankly baffled by Ilya Somin's claim that there are plausibly five votes to strike down the PBA Act on Commerce Clause grounds. The most obvious problem with his argument.
Most: It pains me to link to them. Fox News (via Broadsheet):"Congress is practicing medicine and the Court has decided to let it, in direct conflict with its own precedent..
I finally got a chance to read MA v. EPA, the recent decision requiring the EPA to reasonably justify its decision not to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air.
What do you mean we can't punish oral sex just because it happens off-campus? Let's install cameras! It will destroy our precious bodily fluids educational mission!The War On (Some Classes.
I am proud of my non-home and native land today, as the Canadian Supreme Court unanimously rejected a government policy that permitted the indefinite detention of foreign born suspects based.
In comments to this post, I'm afraid that regular commenter Anderson has fallen for the old conservertarian bait-and-switch:Yeah, quite frankly, I think punitives are a terrible idea in general --.