Bobo. ...Jamelle has more. The basic con Brooks is running for the Ryan budget is that because Ryan refuses to specify the specific cuts that would flow from his plan for upper class tax cuts and increased defense spending, it's not fair for anyone to...
Author: Scott Lemieux
In attempting to rebut Koppleman's point that the argument against the ACA has striking parallels with Hammer v. Dagenhart, amidst a bunch of other howlers Althouse inadvertently reaffirms his point:.
Balkin: One hopes that, in light of these remarks, a great weight has now been lifted from Judge Smith's shoulders. Perhaps now, having received assurances from the President of the.
Andrew Koppelman is correct that Hammer v. Dagenhart would be the most obvious precedent for a Supreme Court decision striking down the ACA: Both then and now, challengers to the statutes had to propose that the Supreme Court invent new constitutional rules in order to strike...
It's a crucial organizing principle of the modern Republican Party.
The 5CA wingnut power trio.
I know my own pet favorite -- Stuart Taylor -- will be a longshot, but I'm glad that he got Richard Cohen in there. ...also, I think we can all agree that it's about time for the Editors to come out of retirement. More classic...
You know, Jose Feliciano, you got no complaints. Jose Reyes playing for Jeffrey Loria, you got many complaints. Picks soon. Alas, I suspect Howard will be giving money.
Ann Friedman's political, link-added summary of the National Magazine Awards is doubly useful. The complete exclusion of women from the opinion section is particularly egregious; if anyone can come up.
Today's worst person in the world, David Stern: "David Stern would love a system in which Anthony Davis and the rest of Kentucky's freshmen stars were required to try to repeat." Yes, players should play for an extra year without just compensation for the NCAA...
Glenn: That there is such vehement condemnation over this strip-search ruling, almost all of which ignores the fact that the Obama administration was fully on board with it and helped.
Apparently, today's winger meme is that a (Democratic) president offering some mild veiled criticism of the Supreme Court constitutes opposition to the institution of judicial review.