Ye Gods is this stupid.
Author: Scott Lemieux
Via one of the editors of the book under attack comes this instant classic from Joseph Epstein, which I can only assume was designed to bait Berube into temporarily re-starting.
So many candidates! Tucker Carlson. Ev psych sexists. Our Galtian overlords. CBS, Michael Patrick King, and Whitney Cummings.
I called it! His season batting line entering that AB: 108/178/157. Hey, quality beats quantity... Should the Rays win, I'm sure a lot of BoSox fans will complain about the parade of stiffs that Girardi ran out to the mound in game 162. My position...
While civil rights used to mean that you shouldn't be denied employment based on an irrelevant personal characteristic, wingers seem to think that civil rights constitute a right not to.
In light of the Obama administration's decision not to seek an en banc rehearing of the 11th Circuit's ruling that the ACA is unconstitutional, there has been some good stuff.
Yesterday LGM's palatial capital region offices received their copy of Corey Robin's The Reactionary Mind. If I understand correctly, one of the book's main arguments is that attempts to distinguish between a good, reasonable Burkean conservatism and a nasty Randite/Calhounite/Reaganite variety don't really fly. I...
Friend of LGM and dismayingly relevant author Charles Pierce has a new politics blog at Esquire, which is of course excellent. See, for example, this analysis of the Republican attack.
We don't know if the Red Sox will complete the choke, but they've already blown it. And while Epstein isn't to blame for the choke per se, it's hard to.
Logically consistent Maggie Gallagher: The fact that members of LGM are not routinely given speaking gigs by Republican organizations is a clear violation of their civil rights. Shorter Maggie Gallagher: Gays and lesbians must be treated as second-class citizens because otherwise people might disagree with...
As others have already pointed out, Matt Miller's latest column will be the worst argument in favor of a third party until whichever of he or Tom Freidman submits the.
I'm pretty much where my fellow Mittens skeptic Jon Chait is. I still don't think my analysis of Romney's fundamental vulnerabilities was wrong; it's still amazing that someone who lost.