I don't want to repeat myself and I'm reluctant to engage in further conflict with some of the people on the interwebs whom I most admire. So I'll mostly let readers judge for themselves about dsquared's response, which as always is worth reading. I do,...
Author: Scott Lemieux
Since I'm guessing that Glenn's tweet is directed at me, I should clarify what I mean in my previous post. When I said that the issues Friedersdorf focuses on are.
Obviously, I concur with pretty much everything in djw and Erik's posts about the inexplicably celebrated Conor Friedersdorf essay in which he congratulates himself for being too good for the.
I have a piece up at the Prospect about how, contrary to the conventional wisdom, embracing reproductive freedom has almost certainly been a net win for Democrats in national elections.
With the major exception of campaign finance, I'm inclined to think that the near-libertarian consensus that's grown around the First Amendment is a good thing. But it is an international.
You know, given the state's two most prominent current politicians if any team had to be screwed by the scabs I'm glad it was the Packers. Admittedly, Walker and Ryan.
I wonder if the "UnSkewed Polls" hack is the same guy who was doing the Real Clear Politics projections that showed California, Illinois, Washington, and Michigan leaning Bush in 2000. And didn't a similar essay arguing that skewed polls were obscuring an inevitable McCain victory...
Excellent point made here by longtime friend of LGM gmack. I took the word of the ESPN analysts that the question of who caught the ball is unreviewable. .
After her exclusive comments in the wake of last night's game, former Washington D.C. Chancellor of Public Schools and current full-time grifter head of some union-busting "students first" organization Michelle.
Oh, Colonel Mustard. And Jacobson is still keeping his 4-part series about how Warren is so un-American that she once put Sriracha rather than ketchup on an omelet under wraps, so Warren better build up a substantial lead...
Four points about Matt's post defending taxing wage income at much higher rates than income derived from capital: I'm confident that the assertion that there's a consensus among economists that.
It wasn't a "gaffe"; if anything, it understates Republican contempt for working people.