Author: Scott Lemieux
I have some further discussion of my contentions (mostly but not entirely in agreement with Paul's piece) that 1)the bill is properly viewed as constitutional, 2)the Court is very, very.
Henry's give 'em enough rope approach to this remarkable McArdle post is a sound one. As an alternative, I'll try isolating a couple particularly instructive sentences: One cannot help but.
Black and Cole make a point that can't be made often enough: the pro-choice position is a principled moral position, reflecting important moral values. Women's equality and freedom are real.
Col. Mustard poses what he considers a difficult question: What if Barack Obama were not President, and Democrats did not control Congress. Would liberals be so willing to give the.
A great progressive moment. And what Yglesias said about Pelosi.
It's pretty impressive that John Boehner's first substantive argument (that you won't be able to keep your health insurance under this plan) is a flagrant, baldfaced lie. I'm also interested.
Glenn Reynolds: "here are some photos from that antiwar rally today in DC. Note the Soviet-nostalgia T-shirt. But guess which one the press will cast as “extremist?”" Glenn Reynolds, quoting.
Dahlia Lithwick has an excellent response to claims (from both predictable and normally more astute quarters) that Obama is likely to pay some kind of political price for attacking the.