The dog ate my attachment

The sub-frivolous complaint filed against Judge Boasberg for the crime if issuing unanswerable rulings against them has been dismissed:

A high-ranking federal appeals judge dismissed an ethics complaint filed by the Justice Department against Judge James E. Boasberg, whose rulings repeatedly raised questions about the Trump administration’s respect for the rule of law, including regarding the deportation of Venezuelans to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador.

The seven-page dismissal order found that Chad Mizelle, the former chief of staff to Attorney General Pam Bondi, failed to substantiate allegations that Judge Boasberg had violated the Code of Conduct for United States Judges with comments he was accused of making at a private meeting of judges. Even if the comments had been substantiated, the order said, there was nothing inappropriate about them.

The order was signed by Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which posted it to its website this weekend. Mr. Mizelle, the Justice Department and Judge Boasberg did not respond to requests for comment on Sunday.

The complaint, which was filed in July, coincided with a broad and ongoing effort by administration officials and their allies to attack the credibility of judges who rule against the Trump administration, and in some cases to call for their impeachment. Judge Boasberg, the chief of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, became a particular focus after he attempted to block the deportations to El Salvador, then attempted to open an inquiry into why planes headed for the prison did not turn around, despite a court order.

What makes this particularly Pam Bondi is that the government…just didn’t bother to ever submit the attachment that allegedly contained the “evidence”:

Mr. Mizelle’s complaint claimed that, during a closed-door meeting with other judges last March, Judge Boasberg had expressed concern that President Trump might disregard court orders, triggering a constitutional crisis. That, the complaint argued, was evidence of bias against the administration and amounted to an attempt by the judge to “improperly influence” his colleagues.

But according to the dismissal from Judge Sutton, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, Mr. Mizelle did not provide evidence that Judge Boasberg had actually made the comments at the heart of his complaint. A footnote in the complaint references an “Attachment A.” That document appears to never have been provided, despite a court’s follow-up request.

“A recycling of unadorned allegations with no reference to a source does not corroborate them,” Judge Sutton found. The order also points out that, even if there were evidence to back up allegations about Judge Boasberg’s comments, “a judge’s expression of anxiety about executive-branch compliance with judicial orders, whether rightly feared or not,” would not have been inappropriate in a private setting.

As bad as things are, they would be even worse if more of the denizens of TrumpWorld were even remotely competent.