SCOTUS rules Article I doesn’t apply to Donald Trump
By 
Joe Biden couldn’t exercise executive powers explicitly delegated to him by Congress, while Donald Trump can exercise executive pseudo-powers explicitly denied to him by Congress.
What could explain these apparently diametrically opposed Principles of Law?
It is a deep and terrible mystery.
No snark: This is a total disaster, but a balrog and I am already weary:
A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed President Trump to fire one of the leaders of the Federal Trade Commission, the latest in a series of emergency orders enabling the president to remove Democratic members of several independent agencies.
Mr. Trump had fired Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, two Democratic members of the F.T.C., in March. The federal agency, which enforces consumer protection and antitrust laws, typically has five commissioners — three from the president’s party and two from the opposing party.
After their firing, the two commissioners had said they planned to challenge their removal in court, relying on a 1935 landmark Supreme Court case, Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, that also involved the firing of an F.T.C. commissioner.
In its brief order Monday, the court said it would consider in December the broader question of whether to overturn the 90-year-old precedent that has prevented presidents from removing independent regulators without cause and solely over policy disagreements.
. . . ABC unfired Jimmy Kimmel for the moment, which suggests there’s got to be a morning after I suppose. ETA: DamnYankeesLGM and Murc both suggest that Kimmel may bend the knee, with a fulsome apology and a contribution to the Charlie Kirk Memorial Fund or what have you. We shall see, which I imagine is the whole point here (Are they yelling Pittsburgh?)