The antebellum slave power was, for obvious reasons, a big fan of suppressing debate. So it’s not surprising that the contemporary party of Calhoun would use similar tactics to try to protect a neoconfederate nominated to be Attorney General of the United States:
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) rose on Tuesday and objected to a speech Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) was giving in opposition to the nomination of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) as attorney general.
McConnell took particular issue with Warren as she quoted a letter written by Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther King Jr.’s widow, when Sessions was under consideration for a federal judgeship in 1986.
McConnell invoked the little-used Rule XIX, which says that “No Senator in debate shall, directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another Senator or to other Senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a Senator.” King’s letter argues that, during Sessions’ time as a prosecutor in Alabama, “Mr. Sessions has used the awesome power of his office to chill the free exercise of the vote by black citizens.” It was that portion of the letter that McConnell read back to the presiding officer, arguing that it was over the line.
The Republican presiding in the chair, Sen. Steve Daines of Montana, agreed with McConnell, ruling her in violation of the order and forcing her to sit down.
“I am surprised that the words of Coretta Scott King are not suitable for debate in the United States Senate,” Warren replied.
Here’s the letter Mitch McConnell doesn’t want discussed, because he is strongly determined to get someone who was deemed too racist to be a District Court judge by a Republican Senate confirmed as the nation’s top law enforcement officer.
Next from McConnell: “Hey, Roger Taney was confirmed as Attorney General, so there’s binding precedent QED.”