Month: May 2010
This week we deal with disability, gender identity, cross-ethnic relationships (OK, 'deal' might be too strong a word) and Mercedes and Santana unleash some amazing vocal mojo. Plus we find.
I have to apologize in breaking in to the 24/7 coverage about the Kagan appointment that our readers expect and demand from LGM, but let's face it: this is one.
This seems like a good time to note that Matt is completely right about judicial term limits. I've been through this before, so rather than elaborating again I'll just emphasize.
I don't mean to join in making this an all-Kagan-all-the-time blog, but some commenters have raised points that may help to clarify the argument I'm making. The question of whether.
I just did an NPR show with UC-Irvine dean Erwin Chemerinksy about the Kagan nomination. Some of the tepid quality of the support for Kagan is illustrated by the fact.
Not to pick nits, but I assume Steve Benen knows that the problem with the Federal ratio (e.g., "3/5 compromise") wasn't that it defined slaves as "three-fifths of a person".
I heard a soundbite from UC-Irvine law dean Erwin Chemerinksy this morning about Kagan, in which he speculated that Kagan's warmth and personal charm would endear her to senators during.
It's been difficult to blog about this, as, well, this is ongoing and changing hourly. The Liberal Democrats commenced negotiations with the Conservative Party out of respect for the Tories.