Home / General / Happy Centennial to the National Park Service

Happy Centennial to the National Park Service

Comments
/
/
/
42 Views

DEE1609Monument1-feat

One hundred years ago today, Woodrow Wilson signed the bill creating the National Park Service. While other nations do have national parks, no other nation has used the idea to also tell interpretations of the nation’s history, protecting not only battlefields and a few other nationally famous places, but also relatively obscure places that tell different stories, often outside of the mainstream of national narratives. During the last 8 years, with bills to create new national parks out of the question in the face of hostile Republicans utterly outraged by gay people’s existence, not to mention their acceptance in American society, President Obama has used the Antiquities Act to create national monuments, usually to add to the diversity of experiences told by the NPS, including the Stonewall Inn. Just yesterday, Obama created a new national monument, the Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument in northern Maine. There have been calls for a national park in northern Maine for a very long time, but the lack of federally controlled land combined with the hostility of local residents who believe the timber industry is going to make a comeback to make it very difficult. Finally, the founder of Burt’s Bees gave nearly 90,000 acres of pristine land to the government to make it happen. Hopefully, this sets the groundwork for an expansion of the park over the years, especially as tourist dollars start flowing to the region. Expect more national monuments between now and January, particularly the Bears Ears in Utah and unprotected areas around the Grand Canyon in Arizona, as well as more land in Nevada as Harry Reid has sought to cement his legacy in that state, in part by making the land where Cliven Bundy was illegally grazing a national monument.

Of course, the National Park Service also faces major problems, including that all these new monuments do not come with additional funding and there is a ridiculous backlog of basic maintenance projects that is forcing the agency to seek corporate funding and therefore sponsorship, which is a form of pollution. But who can blame them? Another major issue is of course climate change, where the parks are having to adapt to rapid changes in often very sensitive locations. The parks are trying to educate the public about climate change, despite continued hostility from Republicans who refuse to fund any of it. They are also making infrastructure changes where they can, especially in coastal regions. That’s going to be a continued struggle. Maybe someday Congress will actually properly fund the agency again.

Even with those problems, the national parks are also national treasures and it’s exciting to see President Obama so proactive in creating new ones, protecting American lands and telling American historical stories for the future.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Davis

    Then there’s the added benefit of pissing off Paul LePage.

  • ChrisS

    Of course, the National Park Service also faces major problems, including that all these new monuments do not come with additional funding and there is a ridiculous backlog of basic maintenance projects

    It baffles me that “pro-business” republicans look at tourists and outdoor recreators flocking to national parks and USFS lands and think, “this is awful.” They really have a horrible record when it comes to public land and failing to see how dollars flow.

    Yellowstone is a bit of an outlier, but holy christ what a money making racket they have there.

    The Adirondacks are a state park, but getting any extra money for rangers and park staff is like pulling teeth. Meanwhile, the state is happy to spend piles of money on advertising to draw more and more tourists who shit on the side of trails and dump trash everywhere.

    • GeorgeBurnsWasRight

      You’re not looking at it the way business does.

      If the for-profits companies ran Yellowstone, for example, there would be lots of high-end hotels and the admission fee would soar the way DisneyWorld’s has. And probably there’d be amusement park rides. Certainly several casinos. And glitzy shows celebrating the glories of nature so that people never needed to even leave the hotel for their Park experience.

      Off in the remote areas there would be mining plus who needs trees in the parts that nobody sees, so call the lumberjacks in.

      • so-in-so

        I see a CEO position in SOMEBODY’S future…

        Well, if you keep the plans more quiet.

  • NeonTrotsky

    Owyhee Canyonlands would be another good one, would really tick off the sovereign citizen types too

    • Yeah, seems to be less momentum around that one.

      • Nixonlandia

        Don’t forget how hard it seems to be to protect Bears Ears because it might infringe on the right of some Bundyesque yahoos to steal priceless cultural artifacts.

  • Jackov

    I purchase an annual pass every year though I am lucky
    if I make it to a single park. Hopefully, the “extra” $60
    helps delay Death Valley NP sponsored by Arrowhead and
    Amazon’s Olympic National Park for a few more years.

  • (((Malaclypse)))

    By fortuitous coincidence, mini-Mal and I are spending the week camping in Acadia, so Thanks, Obama!

    • N__B

      I am drooling wth envy.

      Which is really unfortunate, since I’m also eating pizza.

It is main inner container footer text