I suppose it's fine to try and carve out positions that explicitly appeal to white male voters, but not if it means watering down the core values of the Democratic.
I think some of the ways in which a generic Democratic president differs from a Republican are well-known to informed observers, if they tend to drop out of discussions of.
An interesting and somewhat puzzling argument has been cropping up in comments from (amongst others) esteemed LGM commenters drip and John Emerson. drip:the existence of the filibuster gives the democrats.
Chris Bowers:African-Americans support Democrats by about an 8-1 ratio. All 42 African-American members of the House and Senate are Democrats.The LGBT community supports Democrats by about a 3-1 ratio. Both.
