civil rights
In light of two controversial 5-4 Supreme Court decisions this week, Matt is reminded of Jeffrey Toobin's point that "In every major case since he became the nation’s seventeenth Chief.
Commenting in defense of grandfather clauses that help to perpetuate previously racist admissions policies and John Roberts's empty formalism in Parents Involved, David Nieporent asserts:And both you and Stevens might.
Unlike Ed Whelan, the Iowa Supreme Court is required by existing norms to actually make arguments in defense of its opinions. One of the arguments they make in Varnum is.
John McCormack asserts that Ed Whelan provides a "takedown" of the Iowa Supreme Court's same-sex marriage ruling. Wow, could it be that a conservative has actually engaged in analysis of.
Aye. Not the rules, but rather the policies that the rules enabled. Important distinction.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court considered a provision of the Voting Rights Act that requires a federal remedy if a members of a minority group has "less opportunity than other members.
It's s a beautiful morning in Boulder, and later today I'm going to take a bus the 25 miles down the turnpike to Denver and Invesco Field, to hear Barack.
Jesse and David say most of what needs to be said about Bruce Bartlett's op-ed, but it's worth saying more about one specific point. The central problem with Bartlett's argument.