Category: you’d have to be a grade A moron to question Exxon’s climate scienticianism

Home /
This post from Michael Asher at DailyTech has already brought predictable yodels from climate change skeptics. From what I can gather, Asher supplies — once again — ample evidence that he’s functionally innumerate: In 2004, history professor Naomi Oreskes performed a survey of research papers on climate change. Examining peer-reviewed papers published on the ISI […]
Great stuff from Eric Boehlert on the latest NYT hit piece on Al Gore. As he says: Where the Times went so wrong was that after it discovered there was, in fact, very little serious debate within the mainstream scientific community (i.e. “the middle ground”), the paper still plowed ahead with its controversial thesis and […]
It is main inner container footer text