This post from Michael Asher at DailyTech has already brought predictable yodels from climate change skeptics. From what I can gather, Asher supplies — once again — ample evidence that he’s functionally innumerate: In 2004, history professor Naomi Oreskes performed a survey of research papers on climate change. Examining peer-reviewed papers published on the ISI […]
Category: you’d have to be a grade A moron to question Exxon’s climate scienticianism
The gargling sound you may have heard earlier today came from deep within the throat of Noel Sheppard, who’s yowling about Newsweek‘s belated discovery — twelve years after Ross Gelb
Steven Hayward, Senior Fellow at the Pacific Research Institute and Weyerhauser Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, has a documentary out that claims to refute the “overall pessimism
Great stuff from Eric Boehlert on the latest NYT hit piece on Al Gore. As he says: Where the Times went so wrong was that after it discovered there was, in fact, very little serious debate within the mainstream scientific community (i.e. “the middle ground”), the paper still plowed ahead with its controversial thesis and […]