Today, we have one known known: Donald Rumsfeld is dead.
Rumsfeld’s upbringing isn’t really very interesting; upper-middle class German-American family from Illinois, Boy Scouts, Princeton, ROTC, marriage at 22, kids, bit of time in the Navy. He started in politics in a pretty normal way, as a congressional aide to David Dennison of Ohio and then Robert Griffin of Michigan. He then worked at a banking firm for a couple of years in the early 60s, but then ran for Congress in 1962. He won that race and served four terms. He was a generally moderate Republican at this time and supported civil rights legislation. He also cosponsored the Freedom of Information Act, an ironic move given his later career. But during these years, he was exposed to a vile force that has done tremendous damage to the world—the Economics Department at the University of Chicago. This would transform his views on the world, as these ideas placed the seeds of evil in so many people over the decades and all the way to the present. How much did Milton Friedman come to love Don Rumsfeld? He later bemoaned Reagan selecting George Bush as his vice-president as the greatest mistake of his presidency (how dare he use the term “voodoo economics!”) and claimed that if Reagan had listened to him and selected Rumsfeld instead, “I believe he would have succeeded Reagan as president and the sorry Bush-Clinton period would never have occurred.” Hoo boy. What a world that would have been.
In 1969, Rumsfeld resigned from Congress to go work for a nice man named Richard Nixon. The new president wanted to reform the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO), which administered most of the War on Poverty. Rumsfeld, who had voted against its creation and who still believed it should be eliminated, did not want to take the job of director. After all, by this time he was pretty committed to his Randian economics. But Nixon, who believed that it should exist in some way but under conservative leadership, convinced him to take the job. But hey, at least he got to hire some really lovely people like Frank Carlucci and Dick Cheney to work under him. Pleased with Rummy’s administration, Nixon named him Counselor to the President in 1970 and allowed him to retain the Cabinet rank he had gotten at OEO. Rumsfeld became one of Nixon’s top advisors, with his own office in the West Wing. Why did Nixon like him so much? One quote demonstrates his Nixonian values: “He’s a ruthless little bastard. You can be sure of that.” The Iraqis are sure of that anyway. Finally, in 1973, Nixon named Rumsfeld NATO ambassador.
When Nixon resigned, Rumsfeld returned to Washington to head up Gerald Ford’s transition team. Ford and Rumsfeld were close from their time in the House together. Then, Rumsfeld became Ford’s Secretary of Defense. Here he was a pretty open bureaucratic enemy of Henry Kissinger, as Rumsfeld was committed to building up America’s traditional military forces, unlike the Secretary of the State. Rumsfeld argued the classic old strategy of the Cold War: that a reduction in military armaments and forces would open a gap with the Soviets. So he pushed for significantly expanded missile systems and a big shipbuilding program. Overall, his first run as Secretary of Defense was ultimately relatively uncontroversial compared to others in the Cold War. Kissinger was the more powerful player on foreign policy, even if Rumsfeld was very good at playing the inside Washington game.
Like any rich Republican with connections throughout the defense industry and every other government-related business, Rumsfeld found his talents in high demand after the Ford administration. He became president and CEO of the pharmaceutical company G.D. Searle. He won a bunch of big awards for being such a great CEO, which I have little doubt was about currying favor from this very powerful Washington insider. He was CEO of General Instrument, a semiconductor company, from 1990-93 and then chairman of Gilead Sciences, another Big Pharma firm, from 1997-2001.
At the same time, Rumsfeld was a useful guy for Republican presidents to have around. In 1983, for instance, Reagan named him his Special Envoy for the Middle East, which allowed him to meet with a good buddy: Saddam Hussein. They had lots in common actually, such as opposing both Syria and Iran. Of course, Iraq was in the middle of its war with Iran, which the U.S. supported with significant investment on the Iraqi side. Sure, Rumsfeld expressed some mild disapproval of Saddam’s frequent use of chemical weapons, but that wasn’t going to get in the way of the alliance and doing some business. This was just the most prominent of Rumsfeld’s many forays into representing Reagan and then George Bush internationally and on domestic issues. That included everything from Reagan’s Special Envoy on the Law of the Sea Treaty and a member of the Joint Committee on U.S./Japan Relations to his time on the National Economic Commission and being a member of the FCC’s High Definition Television Advisory Committee. Maybe he just got to watch a lot of cool new TVs in that last one, I don’t know. Anyway, more significant was Bill Clinton naming him to the Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States in 1998, which produced a report claiming Iraq, Iran, and North Korea would have intercontinental ballistic missile systems that could strike the U.S. in five to ten years. I wonder if we will run into those three supposed threats later in this obituary?
Rumsfeld was also an active member of the Project for a New American Century, that vile group of neoconservatives who saw the fall of the Soviet Union as an unvarnished victory for the United States that opened the door for the U.S. to dominate the world through an aggressive free-market capitalism backed with robust military force. Just what the world was asking for. People such as Rumsfeld, working with Paul Wolfowitz, Scooter Libby, Dick Cheney, and other lovely people basically believed that the U.S. should not be restrained by international law and they did the intellectual work to create the American response to 9/11 before it even occurred, ready to go with turning Iraq into the personal experiment in American awesomeness and badassery. Their 2000 document “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” was such an aggressive statement of American power that it received both national and international condemnation for seeking to overthrow world order, especially after all the people involved with it ended up working for George W. Bush.
It is of course Rumsfeld’s return to the position of Secretary of Defense under Bush that this obituary exists. Rumsfeld holds more responsibility than arguably any single person for the disaster of American foreign policy after 9/11 and the huge numbers of dead, both American and Iraqi. Unlike when he served under Ford, there was no great rival to Rumsfeld implementing policy. The entire administration was staffed with Rumsfeld allies, most notably Dick Cheney, the most powerful vice-president in American history. Rumsfeld and his cronies sought to apply PNAC ideals into the administration. This first came through their plans to modernize the military by significantly reducing its size. While earlier in his career Rumsfeld had argued for a larger military, now he saw a fast and effective fighting force as the way to go. This would soon be a major area of controversy when his ideas proved less than effective in his preferred war.
When the attacks of September 11, 2001 took place, Rumsfeld had little real interest in exploring the real roots of the problem of terrorism, especially in regards to Saudi Arabia. Rather, he applied the event to his preconceived notion of the world’s problems. Bush’s Axis of Evil speech simply reflected Rumsfeld’s and PNAC’s obsessions that Bush was happy to share. Rumsfeld was already obsessed with Iraq, Iran, and North Korea, as we saw in the Clinton years. In particular, Rumsfeld wanted to use 9/11 as an excuse to take out Saddam Hussein. In his memoir, Known and Unknown, he later dissembled about all this: “Commentators have suggested that it was strange or obsessive for the President and his advisers to have raised questions about whether Saddam Hussein was somehow behind the attack. I have never understood the controversy. I had no idea if Iraq was or was not involved, but it would have been irresponsible for any administration not to have asked the question.”
This is bullshit. There’s a huge difference between an administration asking a question and an administration telling lies to start a war with a nation that had nothing at all to do with the attacks, pushing uncorroborated and outright false claims about weapons of mass destruction, and engaging in a year-long full-frontal assault to justify an invasion, followed by not having a clue on what to do after the war ended except to apply PNAC’s vision of fundamentalist free market capitalism and assume everyone would see that America was awesome. Rumsfeld has prevaricated throughout this whole history. Another known known.
Even so, as the nation planned his war against Iraq, Rumsfeld kept complaining that the U.S. was going to use too many troops! You don’t need a big military to take out and rebuild Iraq! Not surprisingly, thanks in no small part to Rumsfeld’s ideology, the war and its aftermath was a disaster. It was easy enough to overthrow Saddam. He was a tyrant and unpopular. No one loved Saddam. His military had been seriously hamstrung by the decade of sanctions after 1991.
But who or what would replace him? Rumsfeld and his cronies seemingly never really considered this, placing faith in ex-pat hucksters such as Ahmed Chalabi instead of engaging in real studies of Iraqi culture. Hell, Rumsfeld and his people didn’t even have a functional knowledge of the difference between Sunni and Shi’a Islam, simply the most important point in the history of the religion and the societies build upon it, an issue that it so happens defines much about Iraqi politics and those of the nations around it. Chalabi told Rumseld what he wanted to hear, was rewarded with plum posts in the new Iraqi government, and, welp. When Germany and France questioned the morality of this invasion, Rumsfeld simply dismissed them as “Old Europe,” by which he meant effeminate weak nations, as opposed to Bush’s Coalition of the Willing, which was super manly and buff and well-oiled with flaunting muscles. Poland will not be forgotten! Meanwhile, there was this slight war going on in Afghanistan all through this period. Given that’s where Al Qaeda actually was and where Osama Bin Laden was hiding, you’d think Rumsfeld would have cared about this, but he didn’t. He thought of it is as a sideshow to the real show in Iraq. Given that he didn’t care about nation-building one bit, even as he was embracing wars that required it, his disinterest in Afghanistan undoubtedly made the whole situation there even worse than it had to be.
The disaster began in Iraq almost immediately. Cultural institutions and Iraq’s amazing cultural patrimony were looted to sell on the black market. Rumsfeld’s response: “Stuff happens … and it’s untidy and freedom’s untidy, and free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things. They’re also free to live their lives and do wonderful things. And that’s what’s going to happen here.” Freedom baby! He also responded, “The images you are seeing on television you are seeing over, and over, and over, and it’s the same picture of some person walking out of some building with a vase, and you see it 20 times, and you think, “My goodness, were there that many vases?” In conclusion, Donald Rumsfeld was a monster of a human being. It’s not as if this was unknown. George H.W. Bush later wrote (or ghostwrote, no doubt), “I’ve never been that close to him anyway. There’s a lack of humility, a lack of seeing what the other guy thinks. He’s more kick ass and take names, take numbers. I think he paid a price for that. Rumsfeld was an arrogant fellow.” Well, Bush can go to hell himself for hiring him and letting him do whatever he wanted, but Bush was also correct.
Rumsfeld’s war was pure ideology. It couldn’t just be fought to eliminate Saddam or fight terrorism. It had to be fought his way, with his military, his preferred weapons, his idealized free-market capitalism replacing Hussein. Of course, there were no weapons of mass destruction, no support of Al-Qaeda, no nothing. The entire war was based upon the lies of Donald Rumsfeld and his friends. Rumsfeld was sure they were there. In March 2003, he said on ABC’s This Week, “We know where they [Iraq’s WMD] are. They’re in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south, and north somewhat….I would also add, we saw from the air that there were dozens of trucks that went into that facility after the existence of it became public in the press and they moved things out. They dispersed them and took them away. So there may be nothing left. I don’t know that. But it’s way too soon to know. The exploitation is just starting.” The exploitation was indeed just starting, but Rumsfeld was the exploiter.
Rumsfeld was central in the torture and “extraordinary rendition” that marked the treatment of Iraqis and Afghanis during these wars. As Rumsfeld supported the use of black site detention, the American use of Abu Ghraib prison, and the endless (and still continuing) detaining of supposed terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, itself a colonial possession stolen from Cuba, he was responsible for the abuses at all of these places. He accepted this responsibility, in no small part because he didn’t care about such minor things as torturing possibly guilty but quite possibly not guilty prisoners. In one memo about forcing prisoners to stand in one position for four hours to break them down, Rumsefld smarmily responded, “I stand for 8–10 hours a day. Why is standing [by prisoners] limited to 4 hours?” Human rights organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union attempted to sue Rumsfeld for his responsibility in these atrocities, but there was no way the U.S. “justice” system was going to hold him accountable for torturing Muslims.
Rumsfeld consistently believed that the right messaging would salvage the popularity of the war for Americans. Talking about “sacrifice” was big for Rummy, but he could never articulate what we were sacrificing for, except to play 9/11 footage over and over again, which had squat to do with Iraq and everyone knew it by 2004, even if they should have known it before. But Rumsfeld could not be moved off this messaging obsession, developing then-secret Pentagon PR plans. He couldn’t even be bothered to sign letters of condolences for dead American soldiers, using a signing machine instead. He had more important things to deal with, like killing brown people.
And of course, there was the greatest bit of messaging in American history: “Now what is the message there? The message is that there are no “knowns.” There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don’t know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don’t know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that’s basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.”
Obviously. It’s a real wonder Rumsfeld couldn’t sell this war to the American parents whose children were dying for no good reason.
For all of this, Rumsfeld received the Ronald Reagan Freedom Award from the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation in 2003. That award is supposed to go to “those who have made monumental and lasting contributions to the cause of freedom worldwide.” And if you consider “freedom” to mean breaking the law to sell arms to Iran and sending the money to commit human rights violations in Nicaragua, then giving it to Rumsfeld makes perfect sense. Moreover, in 2011, CPAC gave Rummy their “Defender of the Constitution Award.” Only the best people.
Finally, Rumsfeld was forced out, undoubtedly the worst Secretary of Defense in American history. Eight retired generals and admirals publicly called for his resignation for his utter lack of competence. Although Bush continued to back him, Rumsfeld retired on election day in 2006. Some Republicans claimed his delay in resigning cost them at the ballot box, but his work was done and it wouldn’t have made any difference.
In the aftermath, Rumsfeld retired to the life of a slightly disgraced public official whose standing in official circles never really suffered. He wrote a memoir, for which he at least had the minor grace to give all the profits to veterans’ organizations. He sat on many foundations and corporate boards. He also started his own foundation, The Rumsfeld Foundation, which brings people in from central Asia to school them in Rumsfeld’s preferred free market fundamentalism. He also complained about paying his taxes.
And then somehow, because the world likes to remind us of connections between human rights crimes between the past and present, Rumsfeld purchased the plantation where Frederick Douglass was taken as a young slave to be broken by a slavebreaker. In Douglass’ first Autobiography, the physical beating he placed on the slavebreaker and the inability of the man to tell anyone about it lest it destroy his business is the moment where his manhood is formed. This land was owned, until today, by Donald Rumsfeld. Evil is attracted to evil.
In a just world, Rumsfeld would have been tried for war crimes, or at least been persona non grata at every event he wanted to attend. Instead, he got a huge advance for his memoirs, established The Rumsfeld Foundation to push his ridiculous ideas both domestically and internationally and was given an award at the annual CPAC conference in 2011.
Finally, the beast is dead, a man who represented the very worst of American arrogance and violence toward the rest of the world. Alas, there are so many beasts to replace him.