The nation never truly desegregated after Brown, but now it is resegregating as fast as possible, whether Baton Rouge or California. This story is from a couple of weeks ago, but quite relevant to the terrible comment threads of the last couple of days, where commenters can’t make the basic connection that “doing what is best for my kids” can also be completely racist in a society that is inherently white supremacist.
In 1947, seven years before Brown v. Board of Education, a federal appeals court in California struck down segregated “Mexican schools” in Orange County. Mendez v. Westminster prefigured Brown; it was the first case to hold that segregation in schools was inherently unconstitutional. Not long after, then-Gov. Earl Warren signed a bill ending segregation in public schools across California, making it the first state to do so in the country. Warren would go on to become the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, and his decision in Brown 65 years ago today followed the contours of the ruling in Mendez.
There was a lesson in this that was forgotten in Brown’s wake. The attack on separate-but-equal was an iterative process, with the struggle on behalf of Mexican students in Orange County inextricably joined to the struggle on behalf of black students in Topeka, Kansas.
Today, resegregation is well underway, and its effects are particularly acute among Latino students. Latinos are more segregated in schools in California than in any other state. Fifty-eight percent of Latino students in California—where the majority of students are Latino—go to intensely segregated schools in which more than 90 percent of their peers are nonwhite.
But I’m sure all those white parents making sure not too many Latinos go to school with their white kids are just doing what is best for their children….
And despite what people like to reduce my arguments to, this isn’t just about white flight to the suburbs. It’s about white people ensuring that wherever their changing living choices might take them that their kids get only the “best,” i.e., the whitest schools possible.
“Brown, in the immediate aftermath, was focused on how do you integrate African-American children into a majority-white school. It didn’t have to be that way,” says Erica Frankenberg, an education professor at Penn State University. “But that’s how it was implemented.
“So much of our model of desegregation was in this biracial, black-white notion, it’s hard for us to actually think about what should it look like, if there’s no white majority? Or if there are three groups?”
Frankenberg is one of the authors of a recent report from UCLA’s Civil Rights Project and Penn State University that found that school segregation is worsening, particularly in the suburbs and in reaches far beyond the South, in states like California, Maryland, Illinois, and New York. At the time of the Brown decision, 80 percent of public school students were white; 15 percent were black. Since then, a radical shift has happened: White students no longer hold the vast majority of seats in classrooms, and more than one in four students in schools are Latino.
Decades after the Brown decision dismantled a dual system of schooling for white and black students, the surges in Latino and Asian student population, and the relative decline in white students in America’s schools, have complicated the conventional thinking on school segregation. Along with white students, Latino students have emerged as one of the most isolated groups of students, with little comprehensive effort aimed at addressing their division from their peers.
Since the late 1960s, Latino student enrollment has boomed by 11 million, particularly in the West, where Latinos make up a majority of students in public schools. At the same time, the percentage of Latino students in predominantly minority schools jumped the most in the West, from nearly 12 percent in 1968 to roughly 42 percent in 2016.
Meanwhile, in California, New York, and Texas, more than half of Latino students were attending intensely segregated schools in 2016.
In 2016, the typical white student went to a school in which 69 percent of students were white. By contrast, the typical Latino and black student attended a school in which 25 percent of the students were white. Black students typically went to school in which 47 percent of their peers were black, while Latino students went to schools that were 55 percent Latino.
Forty percent of all black students went to schools in which 90 percent of their peers were students of color, an 8 percent drop from 1968. In 1988, 32 percent of black students attended schools that were considered non-white.
The segregation of Latino students seemed to happen behind much of the country’s back. In the aftermath of Brown, Frankenberg says, Latinos were practically “invisible,” both as a share of the population and as a matter of public education policy. It wasn’t until 1973, nearly two decades after Brown, that the Supreme Court concluded that Latino students have the right to go to desegregated schools. Keyes v. School District No. 1 was a landmark case against Denver public schools, the first to tackle segregation in a non-Southern city. With its decision, the Supreme Court opened up challenges to segregation not codified in the law and determined that the Latino and black students “suffer the same educational inequities when compared with the treatment afforded” to white students. Keyes was immediately undermined.Under President Richard Nixon, the Justice Department diverted enforcement of court-ordered desegregation plans, and over time, court-ordered desegregation plans covering Latino students diminished.
Wow, I don’t know what’s more shocking, that such cases would come out of the Racial Paradise of Denver or that America’s Last True Liberal President would undermine desegregation plans.
As the article notes near the end, the region of the country with the least segregated schools today: The South. Racism is just as bad in Colorado and Oregon and California as in Mississippi and Tennessee and Louisiana. It’s just that people don’t say it out loud. They do “what is best for their kids.”