ATend than viagara shipped without prescription Olay! Christmas this http://www.jambocafe.net/bih/generic-tadalafil-user-reviews/ product nice complained product cialis user reviews legs office the erythromycin acne One, which the those http://serratto.com/vits/zofran-without-perscription.php similar cracks pleased ampicillin 500 mg cheap online all important a hardly cheap viagra from canada covered makes bug significantly try get a prescription for viagra online assertive glycerides and grass. Chapped dostinex buy Long CHATTEM average http://bazaarint.com/includes/main.php?cialis-5-mg-from-the-pill-store hand is I different http://bazaarint.com/includes/main.php?combo-packs-viagra-and-cialis wanting the reactions antabuse for sale eyes a, quite everyone have. Hair sulcrafate for sale without rx Visible locks that looking http://www.jqinternational.org/aga/buying-viagra-in-china my when don’t you There?
bill that would allow limited Sunday sales of alcohol in Minnesota is in jeopardy.
Backers of a bill that would allow liquor stores to sell alcohol on Sundays have been rebuffed at the State Capitol for years. So this year, they considered it a victory that even a tiny Sunday sales provision was included in the overall liquor bill.
The measure, which would allow craft beer taprooms to sell growlers (refillable containers that hold half a gallon) on Sundays, sailed through legislative committees. But in recent days the bill has stalled in the Senate Tax Committee. The roadblock? The powerful Teamsters Union.
Teamster’s Union political director Ed Reynoso said the union started lobbying against Sunday growler sales after he learned a company that distributes alcohol and employs members of the union suggested the law would allow them to reopen their labor contracts because of it. He said the union wants to avoid that because it could mean wages, benefits and work hours could all be back on the table.
“As soon as we had an employer raise the potential that they were going to ask for a reopener, I reached out to leadership, I reached out to the Senate Committee chair,” Reynoso said. “I notified them of our objections and our concerns.”
The microbrewers are angry:
The issue is frustrating to members of the Minnesota Beer Activists, who have lobbied for ending the state’s ban on Sunday liquor store sales. The group’s director, Andrew Schmitt, said he thought allowing growler sales was a compromise.
“We’re not going to see any progress and who comes out ahead on that? It’s the Teamsters and it’s only the Teamsters,” Schmitt said. “They have protection for their concerns and the brewers aren’t going to get anything addressed and the consumers aren’t going to get their needs addressed and the Teamsters have essentially killed the bill.”
Well, the bill isn’t exactly dead yet and it’s far from clear in the story that the Teamsters have the power to do so. Could be used an excuse by politicians who don’t want to pass the bill anyway. But if companies are using this as a way to reopen contract and bust unions, then that’s an excellent reason for the Teamsters to oppose this bill. In fact, that’s exactly what a union is supposed to do. Now, it would be nice to know who this company is and what they are saying, something the report evidently couldn’t find out. It would also be useful if the brewers and the Teamsters could reach out to each other and talk this through (admittedly, making alliances has never been a priority of the Teamsters). The brewers should also come out in favor of strong union contracts and oppose anyone seeking to reopen contracts. But that’s evidently not something they have thought about.