Upwards of 10 new alleged Sandusky victims have emerged. The judge who inexplicably let an alleged violent criminal facing more than 200 years go on $100,000 in unsecured bail worked for Sandusky’s
victim trap charity. And his former boss, America’s Greatest Moral Sage With the Possible Exception of Antonin Scalia, had a dismissive attitude toward sexual assault.
As for this, I assume that Sandusky is laying the grounds for a 6th Amendment appeal, right? You have to admit that an “ineffective counsel” argument is acquiring some plausibility…
…on the general issue, see Charlie.