Subscribe via RSS Feed

Your Republican Party!

[ 84 ] May 10, 2012 | Erik Loomis

The modern Republican Party: creating myths about what the Founders thought out of thin air yet actually opposing what the Founders invented while screaming tyranny.

The latest example of the second part of this equation comes from the House passing a bill eliminating the census surveys that have been part of the census process ever since 1790 when noted tyrant and suppressor of civil liberties Thomas Jefferson created it to learn more about how the nation’s people lived.

Some choice quotes:

“It would seem that these questions hardly fit the scope of what was intended or required by the Constitution,” said Rep. Daniel Webster (R-Fla.), author of the amendment. “This survey is inappropriate for taxpayer dollars,” Webster added. “It’s the definition of a breach of personal privacy. It’s the picture of what’s wrong in Washington, D.C. It’s unconstitutional.”

Yes, because the government that created the census surveys didn’t know much about the Constitution since it only consisted of several delegates to the Constitutional Convention.

Also, the real Daniel Webster is no doubt rolling over in his grave (or more likely giving a 15 hour speech about it in the afterlife) about what an idiot his namesake is.

And of course, Steve King, man of genius:

“I think it’s important to have the information, but it’s important that people have freedom and liberty and we do not have an intrusive federal government that would impose a fine on people if they didn’t let the information come out about whether they had a flush toilet,” said Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa).

I guess this all makes sense though, because there’s no question the Republicans are opposed to the Enlightenment.

Comments (84)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Malaclypse says:

    noted tyrant and suppressor of civil liberties Thomas Jefferson

    This just proves that Democrats have a long history of perfidy. I mean, the man messed with the Bible, so he was clearly a secrit muslin.

  2. JohnR says:

    There is no history; only Zuul.

  3. It makes a lot of sense to destroy data if data destroys your positions.

  4. Gary K says:

    Concern that people might have to report they don’t have flush toilet: high (or so he says).

    Concern that someone in the US might not have a flush toilet: meh.

  5. Davis X. Machina says:

    Once the Obama administration rolled down the windows on the Statistical Abstract why would you pay to keep on feeding a horse you’ve already sold?

    (From the pet peeve dept.)

  6. Davis says:

    As a census taker in 1970, I asked that question.

  7. Billy Bell says:

    The latest example of the second part of this equation comes from the House passing a bill eliminating the census surveys that have been part of the census process ever since 1790…

    Mmmmm….Yeah….the questions are virtually identical!

    Compare the census form of 1790 to the census form of 2010.

    It’s like looking back into time!

  8. LukcyJimJD says:

    The paranoid lunatic right really hate the question about flush toilets, because if they answered it honestly, they’d have to admit that they pee in their pants.

    • Holden Pattern says:

      Oh, come now. The question is just whether or not a flush toilet is present, not whether the respondent is able to use it.

    • David Vitter says:

      Sure, you call yourselves pro-choice, but when the shit hit the cloth, you all are nowhere to be found. Hypocritical libtards!

  9. Ben says:

    More Daniel Webster jokes, please

    Really any jokes about how historical figures react to current events in the afterlife

    • UberMitch says:

      Thomas Jefferson would surely react to this by fucking a slave.

    • Erik Loomis says:

      A request for more Daniel Webster jokes cannot be turned down. More on this soon.

      • Hogan says:

        Webster, Clay and Calhoun walk into a bar . . .

        • Bill Murray says:

          Daniel Webster and a proton were in Foggy Bottom and Webster asks the proton, “Do you think we should back Lajos Kossuth against the Austrians?” and the proton answers “I’m positive!”

          • Scott Lemieux says:

            This is just a small blog, but some of us love it very much!

            • Hogan says:

              Oh my. Well done indeed.

              • skippy says:

                sorry to be a wet blanket, but that’s not a daniel webster joke, that’s a photon joke w/daniel webster thrown in.

                you could use lierally anybody else in the world as the straight man; the joke comes from the properties of the photon and the pun derived therefrom.

                (i am a professional joke writer, forgive me for nitpicking.)

                here’s a daniel webster joke:

                daniel webster and john calhoun were eating at the senate luncheonette. calhoun remarked, “your speech today on the senate floor, daniel, showed great perspecacity. i commend you, sir.”

                “perspecacity?” said webster. “what’s that mean?”

                “look it up in your book,” replied calhoun.

                “that’s the wrong webster, you moron!”

                • Ben says:

                  That’s a good’un

                  How about puns?

                  What do you call the evil god who constructs an ensnaring mesh where his children are raised using sea creatures?

                  The Devil in-den eel webster

                • Bill Murray says:

                  sorry to be a wet blanket but perspecacity isn’t a word, I assume you meant perspicacity — a penetrating discernment. It comes from the Latin word perspiciō, and its first known use was in 1640.

                  and the fact that it was a photon joke not a Daniel Webster joke was the primary joke.

                • Pseudonym says:

                  Allow me to enlighten you: that was a proton joke, not a photon joke. This is a photon joke.

      • sparks says:

        I want one that easy to visualize Edward Arnold saying it.

  10. njorl says:

    YOU CAN TAKE MY FLUSH TOILET WHEN YOU WRENCH IT OFF MY COLD DEAD ASS!

  11. efgoldman says:

    I’m composing a fantasy in which Zombie Thomas Jefferson rises out of the ground, goes to the capital, and slaps all the TeaTards silly on the steps.

  12. Jim Lynch says:

    To be sure, King is a pustule on the body politic.

    Still, Sherman did utilize the census when planning his 1864 campaign. Its data came in particularly handy after Atlanta fell, when his thoughts turned to salt water. He deduced that not only would his army not starve while marching through Georgia, but would likely feast (which it proceeded to do).

    But the South has risen, y’all. Its native born legions of Foghorn Leghorns’ today rule the GOP, and demand satisfaction. Death to The Census. And those Iowans who perished in battle to uphold the Union? King could not care less.

    • John (not McCain) says:

      I wish they were Foghorn Leghorns – he was harmless. These people are Yosemite Sams with REAL guns.

    • Pseudonym says:

      Thanks to the Census, not only could his army feast, it could enjoy the use of modern indoor plumbing rather than field latrines.

  13. Bart says:

    Now they’re worried about personal privacy.

    Don’t they know our gross overreaction to 9-11 made that obsolete?

    • Hogan says:

      I think it’s the inconvenience of filling out questionnaires that they object to. If the NSA wants to take satellite photos of my plumbing arrangements, no problemo.

      • DrDick says:

        Or to take photos of you using that toilet or track you using your cellphone, or tap your phones without a warrant, those are all just fine and dandy. DHS is just protecting us from those scary brown Mooslummy peoples.

    • ironic irony says:

      Only if privacy doesn’t involve gays and abortions, dontchaknow?

  14. J.W. Hamner says:

    When will libruls cease their anti-American War on Chamber Pots?!

  15. Andrew says:

    Off-topic, but Glenn Reynolds is accusing Obama of violating Arpaio’s first amendment right to be a racist law enforcement officer:

    http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/142760/

  16. James E. Powell says:

    Don’t the Republicans want a question about the composition of the counter-tops?

  17. a noter of such things says:

    Interesting – perhaps this new opposition is related to the Obama administration’s decision to have the census director report to White House officials?

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/02/05/census_director_to_report_to_w.html

    Also, it sounds surprisingly like Sen. Webster is admitting that there is a right to privacy!

  18. [...] (via a guy called Andrew) EmailDiggFacebookRedditStumbleUponTwitterLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]

  19. c u n d gulag says:

    ‘Webster added. “It’s the definition of a breach of personal privacy. It’s the picture of what’s wrong in Washington, D.C. It’s unconstitutional.”’

    Jeez, and here I thought shoving a video camera into a pregnant woman’s vagina was the very ‘definition of a breach of personal privacy.’

    Whodathunk it was the census?

    Somewhere, the Founding Fathers don’t need to flush for a while – they just pissed and shat their pants in laughter.

    Never mind black people and women – where in the Constitution is it written that feckin’ idjit’s get to vote?

    Also too – Where is it written that they can run for office?

    Also three – There are ‘age minimums’ for office – why not “IQ minimums?’

    Not to set the bar too high – why don’t we require their IQ to be at least the minimum age:
    -IQ of 25 for the House.
    -IQ of 30 for the Senate.
    And born, not hatched.

    And yeah, I know that will decimate the Republicans currently holding office in both houses of Congress – but we gotta start somewhere!

    • actor212 says:

      Jeez, and here I thought shoving a video camera into a pregnant woman’s vagina was the very ‘definition of a breach of personal privacy.’

      People pay good money for those videos.

      • c u n d gulag says:

        Yeah, but not the Conservatives.

        They’re waiting to pass a law allowing them to shove video camera’s into men’s rectum’s to check to see if they’re gay and have any sperm up there.

        Not THOSE, they’ll pay good money for!

        Fapping good money!

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

  • Switch to our mobile site