health care
Henry's give 'em enough rope approach to this remarkable McArdle post is a sound one. As an alternative, I'll try isolating a couple particularly instructive sentences: One cannot help but.
I'm not sure how Ben Stein's understanding of Constitutional law compares with his understanding of science or the convolutions of the market, but he certainly has a flair for atom-splitting.
In comments, McManus points us to what he considers a good progressive argument against passing the health care reform bill. The argument, I think, can be fairly distilled into this.
Fred Barnes is a terribly stupid man. In asserting that "Obamacare" will create a bitterly contentious political environment for decades to come, Barnes writes: We only have to look at.
You may be wondering where the "Obama is coming for your salt!" idea comes from. (Other than pure derangement, I mean.) Apparently, it's a product of one of the oldest.
This illustrates one of the massive inefficiencies that gets built into our massively inefficient health care system by the invidious relationship that can develop between the interests of Big Pharma.
Bart Stupak is happy to blow up health care reform, denying countless people medical care and hence unnecessary illness and death, if access to abortion can't be made more inequitable..
Krugman, after correctly noting the death of irony:The bottom line, then, is that the crusade against health reform has relied, crucially, on utter hypocrisy: Republicans who hate Medicare, tried to.
