In general, I feel the same way as Yglesias and Attackerman about the Venezuelan Embassy’s aggressive spamming tactics. In this case, however, the Venezuelan ambassador’s letter to the edi
You just knew that the announcement that the US wouldn’t respond to a chemical attack with nuclear weapons would bring out the real idiots. Thers is on the case, but let me make a few points cle
Henry’s give ’em enough rope approach to this remarkable McArdle post is a sound one. As an alternative, I’ll try isolating a couple particularly instructive sentences: One cannot he
EMP advocacy is about one thing, and only one thing: Missile defense. This is why EMP advocates conjure up nonsensical scenarios about 95% of the American population dying in a year from a stolen warh
Yesterday at the United States Naval Institute blog, a regular contributor posted an incoherent, hate-filled screed about how teh gays were going to ruin the King James Bible if they were allowed to o
The wife and I were push-polled moments ago by a Family Research Council. As best I recall these were the questions: Do you support taxpayer funding of abortions? Do you favor the 50% cut in Medicare
David Frum compares the conventional and Team B views of Soviet military spending and arms control. The conventional view: The Soviets could increase their arms spending, therefore arms control was wo
Shorter Col. Mustard: The fact that even the polling firm most favorable to the GOP has the Republican candidate trailing by about 10 points is excellent news…for Republicans!