A good first step, anyway. More when I have a chance to read the opinion, although we can be confident that the George W. Bush appointee Jeffrey White is some.
(This will be the second-to-last Who-related visual rhetoric posts for a bit. It concerns the complicated conclusion of the fifth season, which is why it's the second-to-last. It's also a sequel.
I would like to buck the conventional wisdom, but I agree with everybody that the grant of cert in Fisher v. UT Austin is almost certainly the end of affirmative.
Juan Cole: Well, I hate those US drones when used for purposes of warfare. But here is a Gandhian use for them. Let us defy the Syrian regime’s misuse of.
Shorter Alana Goodman: I'm a contemporary conservative. Of course I don't understand the concept of "consent." For that matter, I don't know why people get so upset about forced sterilization.
This week's WPR column considers the rhetoric of war against Iran: The case for attacking Iran relies overwhelmingly on the concept of uncertainty. We don’t know if the Iranians want.
The Texas Railroad Commission, for reasons that I assume have to do with keeping an antiquated state agency relevant, regulates energy policy for the Lone Star State. The TRC met.
Diane Ravitch's piece is so essential I'm reluctant to excerpt from it at all. But these key points stand out to me: The new evaluation system pretends to be balanced,.
- Iran Update: Day 6
- The underpants gnomes theory of war
- Republicans: the party of endless war
- Spain: The correct use of Nope
- Election of the Day: Nepal
- An aura of systematic mendacity con’t
- The aura of systematic mendacity
- Iran Update: Why Not?
- Even the losers get lucky sometimes
- Lots of cash in sight, you could win it all; you could take everything
