General
I agree with Dahlia Lithwick that the Supreme Court is unlikely to appoint the President again in 2004. Not, however, because such appeals would not have "any legal basis." The "our.
It's not exactly news that the Republicans are the party of 15th Amendment nullification, but generally they're taught to be a little less candid...
I identify almost completely with the author of this list. I'd add that the gap between how much I enjoy Sleater-Kinney and how much I'm supposed to is closing, but it's.
Is it just me, or is the Pappas broadcasting decision to give substantial free airtime to local GOP candidates much, much more appalling and indefensible than the whole Sinclair-Swiftboat affair (in.
Not that I don't appreciate the "guide" feature on digital cable, but the description of the next Law & Order episode is "Murder investigation." Whew, I'll never forget that episode!
Paralibris notes the regrettable existence of the "Creation Science (sic) Fair," featuring such stimulating projects as "Life Doesn't Come From Non-life," "Women Were Designed For Homemaking", and "God Made Kitty.".
Another of the American Conservative articles is an endorsement of the Constitution (sic) Party's candidate by founder Howard Phillips. One advantage of supporting a no-hope candidate is the potential for candor,.
Given the paucity of options for principled reactionaries, the editors of The American Conservative gave individual endorsements rather than a collective one. (Remarkable times; even Marty Peretz didn't insist on writing.
