Those would prefer that hundreds of thousands go uninsured rather than any rentier skim some profits are about to get their wish. My guess is that the people upon whom the contradictions are about to be heightened will be less thrilled with this outcome: The...
Author: Scott Lemieux
You will be shocked to know that football players continue to be exempt from significant punishment for crimes ordinary people get charged for.
Before dealing with the latest reported comments of President, Speaker of the House, Senate Majority Leader, Secretary of State, Chief Justice of the United States, Prime Minister, and Grand Poobah.
Vote suppression guru Hans von Spakovsky makes an excellent, if inadvertent, case for the confirmation of Loretta Lynch.
Excellent questions from one of his many accusers: While I am grateful for the new attention to Cosby’s crimes, I must ask my own questions: Why wasn’t I believed? Why didn’t.
R.I.P. I'd have to say that someone who was one of the top two people in the Civil Rights Division from 1960-7 (among countless other accomplishments being on the front.
I regret to say that Rick Hasen, Hank Greely, and Linda Greenhouse all in some measure share my dark view of what the Supreme Court granting cert in King means. There is simply no way to describe what the court did last Friday as a...
As we've previously discussed, conservatives have taken time from their busy schedule of constructing asinine legal theories to strip health insurance from millions of people to spend time parsing the.
I have some thoughts about yesterday's oral arguments and the increasingly broken Democratic system. The fact that the Democrats would have to have a 7-point edge in the popular vote.
Kareem is making sense: Management argues that student-athletes receive academic scholarships and special training worth about $125,000. While that seems like generous compensation, it comes with some serious restrictions: College athletes on scholarship are not allowed to earn money beyond the scholarship. Yet students on...
Ian Millhiser has a terrific explanation for why the Halbig argument is such terrible statutory construction. The most obvious problem with focusing on the phrase "Exchange established by the State".
The comments to the latest Halbig post contain a truly remarkable comment by Patterico which is sort of the definitive analysis from the political and legal movement that brought us.