After seeing this, all I can say is, hopefully Suppan will get hammered tonight!Incidentally, speaking of overrated TV, if I recall correctly, Everybody Loves Raymond was for a significant period of time a weakly-rated critic's darling. Can anyone explain that to me? (The critical darlingness,...
Author: Scott Lemieux
Via alicublog, Michael Totten proposes some "centrists" who won't simply recycle hack talking points. The results are predictably hilarious:Ann AlthouseAndrew SullivanJeff JarvisMatt WelchArmed LiberalMegan McArdleDean EsmayOh, yeah, Ann Althouse--if there's.
As the ratings for Studio 60 get steadily worse, I'll be interested whether the reaction from critics is that this show is too smart for the public, or whether we'll.
Heh-indeedy:Meanwhile, administration figures have correctly discerned that it would be easy to manage the situation in Iraq -- to at least keep some kind of lid on the bloodshed -- if Syria and Iran were cooperating with us. Unlike weak-kneed appeasers who want to try...
A summary of recent Senate polls:* Two Republican incumbents in very serious trouble, Santorum and DeWine.* One Republican incumbent trailing his challenger, Chafee.* Three Republican incumbents virtually tied with their.
Pat Robertson on Mark Foley: "Well, this man's gay; he does what gay people do." Sully:I wonder if that would make Glenn Reynolds vote Democrat.Heh. Indeed! Meanwhile, elsewhere in the.
...is TAP's gain, as it seems that TAPPED--making up for some rather more dubious recent hiring decisions--has snapped up Spencer Ackerman. A superb choice.
Another reminder of why local ownership of media is neither here nor there in terms of either a progressive editorial slant or quality journalism: that epitome of third-rateness the Seattle.
Apparently, George Bush is going to try to revive his privatize-Social-Security agenda, a happy confluence of an awful policy that's exceptionally unpopular. It's hard to follow the logic here:Hey, and.
For reasons Tim Lambert explains in detail, I think Matt is being far too generous to Fred Kaplan's attempt to discredit the Lancet study, which doesn't seem to be any better than his first. Particularly hackish is Kaplan's argument that the study's pre-war mortality rates...
What's really funny about this is that a significant percentage of Reynolds' readers actually thought there was some chance he would vote for Ford. But this Republican-hatchet-man-posing-as-nonpartisan-"libertarian" schtick does seem.
I generally don't do this kind of thing, but in light of this (see also here) I've removed Feminist Law Professors from my blogroll. I regret this, since it's a.