The latest from the always-inexplicable Frank Bruni surely demands a blogger ethics and quality panel. I think Althouse's guest columns were more substantive and coherent.
Author: Scott Lemieux
I assume the "get it right" means that Prick Erry's strategy will simply be to deny that when he wrote that Social Security was unconstitutional he meant that Social security.
Of course not. To amplify Matt's response to Althouse's silly dodging and weaving about Paul merely wanting to "divert[] the matter to the state courts," let's consider the content of.
Let's just say I remain unconvinced that Obama's reappointment of Bernake was a good idea.
I appreciate what I'll charitably assume is the dry wit, but I think the mistake is using the word "impact" at all: Former New York Gov. George Pataki has decided.
Sad, but true.
This really isn't surprising, which isn't to say that some of the specific arguments aren't disappointing. Two points: 1)you don't have to be very dovish to think that the Iraq War was a horrible idea, and 2)while his aggressive tone made him kind of a...
The contrarian truth is that under Plotz Slate has become an excellent magazine; the occasional Jonah Weiner atrocity notwithstanding, the overall quality of writing is very high. Several regulars are.
Of course, it takes Pat Caddell to take arguments an argument that Unity '12! Americans Elect represents a real grassroots third party movement to new heights of farce: Meanwhile the.
In isolation, I agree with Matt and Kevin that the failure to give a lot of coverage to Ron Paul is perfectly defensible. Not only is he clearly a fringe candidate in terms of positioning, we already have evidence of his non-viability -- he ran...
I think this comment from David Mizner -- whose excellent novel you should check out -- gets to the heart of the issue: This argument — could President Obama have.
R.I.P.