Rudy can fail, cheap 70s porn edition
/https://www.thestar.com/content/dam/thestar/entertainment/opinion/2020/10/23/in-the-borat-sequel-a-duped-rudy-giuliani-gets-a-taste-of-his-own-poison/rudy_borat2.jpg)
[The] 70-page suit cites audio recordings and accuses Giuliani, 78, in graphic detail of subjecting her to sexual assault and harassment throughout her employment, forcing her to engage in “violent sex” and attend work video conferences naked and work in short shorts he bought printed with an American flag.
“He often demanded oral sex while he took phone calls on speaker phone from high-profile friends and clients, including then-President Trump. Giuliani told Ms. Dunphy that he enjoyed engaging in this conduct while on the telephone because it made him ‘feel like Bill Clinton,’” reads Dunphy’s suit.
“[Some] of the individuals who Giuliani spoke with on these calls were law clients of Giuliani (such as Mr. Trump), who were unaware that Ms. Dunphy was in the room and could overhear their conversations,” the suit details, describing some of the conversations as highly sensitive.
“These discussions included, for example, strategies as to how to deal with the investigation being conducted by Robert Mueller, and whether it might be possible to distract, intimidate, or otherwise dissuade Mueller from proceeding against Trump.”
I’m no legal ethics expert, but I suggest very tentatively that waiving attorney-client privilege in this way may not meet the standards of professionalism required by various bar associations.
There’s a lot more in the complaint itself, very little of which is suitable for a family blog.
