Home / General / The elite liberal(ish) case for invading Iraq

The elite liberal(ish) case for invading Iraq

/
/
/
1706 Views

Here’s an unpleasant trip down memory lane:

Many other examples follow the guy who somehow managed to parlay being massively wrong into a (disastrous) major party leadership, but this might be my favorite:

We agree that there are a lot of parallels between Wilson and Bush. Where our agreement ends is with the question of what that says about the wisdom of the war.

It’s worth noting that at this point by most of these dudes were not really even pretending that Iraq posed any material threat to the US. Instead, the arguments were mostly premised on dreams about how democracy could be created by force ex nihilo by, er, George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, and some Heritage Foundation interns. (The next move was to say that you never supported that war, just a war that existed in your head that would be fought by a different administration. Which also would have ended very badly, but anyway.)

And, finally, no such summary would be complete without this, which alas is probably a pretty good window into what the administration was “thinking”:

It says a lot that this was a time in which not only Friedman but Rose were taken seriously as public intellectuals. I was there and I can’t explain it.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar
Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views : Ad Clicks : Ad Views :