Month: October 2008
Each December, the state of Alaska hosts a holiday party. Bubbling with seasonal cheer, the public are invited to drop by the governor's mansion -- where Sarah Palin rarely spends.
It's surely highly-paid TV pundits who are completely obsessed with bizarrely involuted meta-critiques of politics as infotainment theater.Yglesias is spot on regarding this, but I think what he's saying can.
...but as far as I'm concerned, there was a coherent, well-informed adult up there, alongside someone who would get a C in a freshman American Politics course.
Even though as political scientist I'm duty-bound to note that tonight's festivities are unlikely to affect the election, I'm also looking forward to watching. I may chime in if there's.
Since there seems to be some confusion here, allow me to save time in comments by explaining a basic distinction:1)Under current law, a woman has a fundamental right to choose.
To follow-up on Adam's point here, the conservative project to separate the implied constitutional "right to privacy" from Roe v. Wade is longstanding. (I should note, contra to Ponnuru's fancy.
I think:Palin also claimed she was eager for the debate since the media had been 'censoring' her: "Getting to speak directly to Americans without that filter of mainstream media trying.
COURIC: Do you think there's an inherent right to privacy in the Constitution?PALIN: I do. Yeah, I do.COURIC: That's the cornerstone of Roe v WadePALIN: I do. And I believe.