Month: December 2004

Home / (Page 5)

Pure Evil

By
|
In General
|
On December 12, 2004
Bob Novak on the Capital Gang, discussing the Rumsfeld dust-up: Look, soldiers always complain. That’s just what they do–it’s a way of life for them.

Danielle Allen

By
|
On December 11, 2004

Furthering my time-wasting in this here coffee shop, your easily distracted blogger has been leafing through a several-month old paper copy of The Chronicle of Higher Education left lying around. The

Trusting Markets

By
|
On December 11, 2004

One downside to my decision to replace my Clinton-era, Windows 98, 1/3 chance of crashing when opening a PDF laptop with a spiffy 2004 model is that I can now access the internet at many of the fine c

Worse than I remembered

By
|
In General
|
On December 11, 2004
When I blasted the Gregoire campaign a few weeks ago for their incompetence, I was primarily thinking of the media and message elements of her campaign. In this week’s Stranger, Sandeep Kaushik gives an even more damning account of her incompetence. In concentrating her efforts on white rural and suburban swing voters–who voted in droves for […]

Dissing the Pac-10

By
|
On December 10, 2004

Bob Somerby provides data for one of my hobbyhorses, the egregious underrating of the PAC-10 in college football. Admittedly, I would prefer that he made the point of comparison the Big 10, given that

More on Dobbs

By
|
In Robert Farley
|
On December 8, 2004
Chuckle. The description off the CNN website for tonight’s Lou Dobbs Show: “Why doesn’t the United States require immigrants to learn English? And how does that affect culture in the U.S.?” What they don’t tell you is that this show was originially aired on a silent short in 1915. The show will come after a […]

More on your favorite subject

By
|
On December 8, 2004

A few random thoughts continuing what Scott said below. First, everyone should read this Neiwart post at Ornicus. I have little to add to it. Yes, some people used faulty and dangerous reasoning to c

Atrios gets right to the heart of the “people with no power are ruining Democratic foreign policy” thesis: Let me add just one thing: Beinart’s obsession is that it’s the “softs” who have prevented Democrats from having a coherent and distinct and sufficiently muscular foreign/anti-terrorism policy. Beinart’s got it exactly wrong. The primary thing which […]
It is main inner container footer text