…and a bit more at the new Russian Navy Blog. It’s not an official Russian Navy blog, but rather is run by an enthusiast who pays a lot of attention to Russian naval developments and translates Russian naval materials. My favorite feature thus far is “Soviet Submarine Disaster of the Day”, although “Incomplete Russian Capital Ship of the Day” runs a close second.
Kathy makes a definitive case. The risk of giving up a red state Senate seat has to create a strong presumption against it, and it just isn’t the job for him. Under the circumstances, choosing someone with Webb’s history of sexism seems like an especially bad idea. I have been skeptical that Clinton’s supporters (as opposed to her staff) won’t get over it if she’s not on the ticket (which is good, because picking her has a lot of negatives), but surely many Clinton supporters wouldn’t find Webb acceptable, and they’d have a point.
All I can say about Bob Novak frothing about Kathleen Sebelius’s allegedly excessive opposition to arbitrarily enforced laws forcing women to carry pregnancies to term is that I hope it moves her up a couple notches on Obama’s veep list. (I especially liked the fact that Novak brought her battles with former Kansas panty-sniffer-in-chief Phil Kline into the mix.) I also liked this:
There is substantial evidence she has been involved in what pro-life advocates term “laundering” abortion industry money for distribution to Kansas Democrats.
Yes, what a scandal–pro-Democratic groups donating money to powerful Democrats who give these resources to other Democrats! I for one am pretty outraged. Almost as outraged as the fact that I’ve heard that the Sun-Times Media Group “launders” money for distribution to hack right-wing columnists…
Rest in peace. Strangely enough, I kind of preferred his acting to his direction.
UPDATE (BY SL): As I think I’ve said before, I agree with the above (TS joins the consensus.) I especially liked his turns in Eyes Wide Shut and Husbands and Wives, with a special favorite being his cameo in A Civil Action (“Oh. Cornell. Well…that’s a…good school.”)
Don’t elect judges.
Simple as that. Because when you elect judges, you don’t get impartial decision-making (to the extent that even exists), you don’t get an environment that allows for the scrupulous acting out of exemplary legal ethics, and you certainly don’t get people who are necessarily the best for the job.
True, appointed judges aren’t necessarily always the best qualified for the jobs to which they are appointed…but it should raise a red flag that electing judges is yet another example of American Exceptionalism. Judges here receive less perfunctory specialized training than house appraisers, and certainly far less than their French peers (the judges’ not the appraisers’) who take a 4-day test simply to qualify to become a judge. What’s more, as a recent case proved (despite what the Supreme Court said), in many states the processes for electing judges are anything but democratic.
Supporters of electing judges counter that it allows for more transparency. That may be so. But excuse me if I am a little skeptical that what we are really getting with judicial campaigns is transparency. I think it’s been a long time since political campaigns provided that (at least since the advent of TV, if not long long before).
So while there’s no way to a perfect judiciary, I’m not so sure that elected judges is the closest to perfection that we can get.
They were shaped like cigars, saucers, coffins and amorphous blinking blobs. They hovered in a menacing manner, traveled at impossible speeds and vanished into the netherworld, or, in one instance, a hedge in Cornwall.
A few carried humanoid life forms, or so it seemed. A few materialized courtesy of the observers’ possibly having had a drink too many, as in the case of an unidentified flying light cluster witnessed loitering in the sky by the patrons of a pub in Kent.
Whatever they were, these phenomena reported to Britain’s Ministry of Defense over the years and made public this month were almost certainly not actual alien aircraft piloted by actual alien beings.
“The government has been telling us the truth,” declared David Clarke, a senior lecturer in journalism at Sheffield Hallam University, who has a side interest in U.F.O.’s. “There are a lot of weird things in the sky, and some of them we can’t explain, but there’s not a shred of evidence for a single alien visitation.”
Oh yeah? Well, explain this, Mr. Smart Guy.
Most pundits now agree that R. Farley has built an insurmountable point lead in the 2008 LGM Challenge:
|1||Lexington Bearded Ducks, R. Farley||2611||99.1|
|2||The Rev. Josh Fields, A. Katz||2373||93.3|
|3||Headless Thompson Gunners, S. Hickey||2326||91.1|
|4||Sluggy McSlugs, C. Moore||2323||91|
|5||kodos423, k. crockett||2254||87.1|
|6||Lungless Wonders, E. Udall||2231||85.7|
|7||Theibault Moor Orioles, J. Theibault||2153||80.1|
|8||JacobyRules, P. Smith||2148||79.8|
|9||Axis of Evel Knievel, D. Noon||2122||77.6|
|10||Wild Loose Comma, C. S||2062||72.6|
However, several competitors refused to concede defeat…
- D. Noon: “Farley’s been using black players. Jesse Jackson was black. You know what I’m sayin’.”
- A. Katz: “My extensive analysis has indicated that if the game used an entirely different set of metrics, I’d be well ahead.”
- E. Udall: “I would be substantially in the lead if we counted exhibition games. EVERY GAME SHOULD COUNT! COUNT THE EXHIBITION GAMES!”
- P. Smith: “Hey, remember back in ’68 when Bobby drafted Denny McClain in the fourth round, and Danny Cater in, like, the 10th, and then was way ahead in late May? Well, we all remember what happened then…”
Dead-enders, all of them.
With due respect to the residents of our not-quite-a-51st-state, Barack Obama shouldn’t be spending either a nickel or a minute on the Puerto Rican primary. Illinois, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Florida have the largest Puerto Rican populations in the United States, and Obama is going to crush in the first five and in all likelihood get crushed in the last. Puerto Rico, unlike most of the states that the Clinton campaign has determined are meaningless, actually is meaningless for any purpose other than Clinton’s quixotic pursuit of the nomination.
This sounds like an incredibly bad idea:
People who normally use Metro Transit’s [the Seattle bus system-ed] special service to get to ball games, community festivals, and other special events should be aware that new Federal Transit Administration (FTA) rules could significantly restrict Metro’s ability to provide this service.
These changes in federal regulations limit Metro’s ability to offer the special event service as it has in the past. Since these rules are so new, the effect they have on each of the events Metro has been serving is not yet known.
This new federal rule redefines “charter service” to potentially include the service that Metro has been offering to sports venues – such as Emerald Downs, Husky Stadium, Safeco Field and Qwest Field. It could also affect special service to local community fairs and events. This includes large-scale events such as the Folklife Festival, Seafair hydro races, Bumbershoot, and the Northwest Flower and Garden Show; and smaller celebrations such as the Bellevue Strawberry Festival and Redmond Derby Days.
If Metro service for an event falls under the new definition of charter service, the agency must first contact private charter firms registered with the FTA to see if any are interested in providing the service. If any firms indicate they are interested, Metro will be precluded from providing the service and the private operators will be given the opportunity to negotiate with the event sponsor for the transportation service.
If no private company is willing and able to provide the transportation service, Metro may be able to continue its special service to the venue.
Metro has been working closely with the FTA and event organizers to understand and clarify the rule requirements, and has received an exemption from the FTA to continue operating service to Mariners games at Safeco until June 30. More information about these rules and the impact on Metro service will be provided as it becomes available.
This is the first time I’ve heard of this; since it’s a new FTA policy, I assume that it has to affect cities other than Seattle. Unless I’m missing something important, the idiocy of this policy is matched only by its chutzpah; the FTA is so certain that government can’t compete with private industry that it will prohibit government from competing with private industry.
Does anyone have a better idea of what’s going on here, or examples from other cities?
…and this is reassuring:
While FTA accepts submissions from private charter operators and qualified human service organizations, FTA does not verify the accuracy of the information submitted. Members of the public using this site should contact the private charter operators directly for more information regarding their services.
Ah! So at least the FTA is explicit about its inability to verify anything that private charter companies tell it; that’s terribly comforting. So if I understand this correctly, “Big Steve’s Big Charters” can register, and thereby preclude Metro from providing service, without anyone knowing or asking whether Big Steve is operating anything more than a 1975 Chevy Scottsdale.
This, dear readers, is what we call a victory for federalism. Thank God that localities can no longer make decisions on how to allocate their transit service.
…ooh, and here’s the registration form. I’m sure they’ll check to make sure that I actually have sixty vans…
…and here’s a Washington Post story on the effects of the policy in DC. HT Woodrowfan.
When it’s 45 degrees and pissing rain — or when you recall that Ted Stevens represents your state in the Senate — the healthy response is to fill a styrofoam cup with Mad Dog and hide in the closet. But on a weekend like this, you begin to think that most of the forces in the universe aren’t actually conspiring against you.
Well, why not? Armstrong’s the idiot who brought them aboard in the first place. (Normally, a “vote of confidence” would be a good sign, but I have the sinking suspicion it’s serious.)
One more thing: if you think (inexplicably) that you have a championship quality roster and it has the worst record in the league, how can this be a defense of the manager? Aren’t managers aren’t, you know, supposed to get teams to achieve what, or ideally more, than they’re capable of? This really is Bavasi in a nutshell.
UPDATE BY ROB:
“In my 23 years, I have never ever seen anything like this,” Armstrong told MLB.com. “We saw it the other way in 2001. I mean, you have to ask yourself, ‘How did the Mariners win 116 games that season with that roster, compared to this roster?’ This is just as inexplicable the other way.”
Joe Posnanski, on how he wants to like Derek Jeter, but..
So why is it that I’m often writing negative things about Derek Jeter? I realized Friday that it has absolutely nothing to do with Jeter himself. No, what drives me batty is that Jeter — maybe because of his star power, or maybe because he’s a Yankee, or maybe because he’s made some very big plays on the national stage, or maybe because he dated all the supermodels, I honestly don’t know what it is — Jeter brings out this quality in people, this superiority, this … it just drives me insane I don’t know if there’s a word for this quality so, as we do here, I’m going to invent a word.
Jeterate (verb) meaning “to praise someone for something of which he or she is entirely unworthy of praise.”
Example: “The father could not but jeterate his daughter for coloring on the wall because she looked so cute.”
Or: “The employee, knowing his job was on the line, jeterated his boss for almost making a 3-foot putt. ‘That was an incredible putt,“ the employee said. ”With that intense break, I doubt Tiger Woods would have even lipped out like you did.“
Or: “The doctor jeterated his patient for not actually gaining any more weight since the visit four days earlier.”
This requires some mild edits; I write negatively about Jeter because I hate him, and “because he dated all those supermodels” should obviously be replaced with “because he infected all those supermodels with herpes”, but otherwise I think I concur with the gist of the argument.