Subscribe via RSS Feed

“I Want to Create A National Epidemic of People Barfing Into Recycling Bins After Reading the First Chapter. Then They Will Know What Love Is.”

[ 172 ] June 7, 2013 |

Even leaving aside the ethical issues, rarely has a book proposal without “Camille Paglia” in the author’s slot seemed so unreadable:

Jonah Lehrer, the disgraced writer who resigned from The New Yorker after he was discovered plagiarizing and fabricating material, has sold a book to Simon & Schuster that uses his journalistic misconduct as a case study of the mysterious and redeeming power of love.


In a 65-page book proposal obtained by The New York Times, Mr. Lehrer described the day last summer — a “muggy Sunday morning in St. Louis” — when his journalistic fraud was discovered.

“I feel the shiver of a voice mail message,” he wrote in the proposal, “A Book About Love.” “I listen to the message. I have been found out. I puke into a recycling bin. And then I start to cry. Why was I crying? I had been caught in a lie, a desperate attempt to conceal my mistakes. And now it was clear that, within 24 hours, my fall would begin. I would lose my job and my reputation. My private shame would become public.”

Few forms of love are as mysterious and yet redeeming, I believe we can all agree, as the love that comes in the form of a dumptruck of money unloaded outside your front door after someone has agreed to publish your shitty book even after your previous shitty book had been revealed to have a lot of made-up stuff in it in addition to all of the erroneous and inane stuff.

Admittedly, the book may offer the opportunity for various fun quizzes. Such as, “Well-compensated author, or eight-year-old poet instantly embarrassed to see what he has written?”

“Here is the simple thesis of this book,” the proposal says: “Love is the only happiness that lasts. It is the opposite of underwear. It is the antithesis of chocolate cake.”

Deep, man. Love is also totally the polar opposite of spray-on tans; that stuff washes off. Bourbon is sort of a gray area.

The book proposal also seems to, at the very least, come close to plagiarism at some point. Even granting that one is a serious ethical issue and the other isn’t necessarily, in this specific case I would recommend less self-plagiarism and more plagiarism of others.


Comments (172)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Hogan says:

    ” . . . we give away what we don’t want and sell what we can’t afford,” he wrote. “And yet, if we are lucky, such losses reveal what remains. …”

    Dear Simon & Schuster,

    Those are not, in fact, examples of loss. Good luck with your shitty book.

  2. DocAmazing says:

    In Lehrer’s case, if plagiarizing the work of others means that he is generating less of his own prose, I’m prepared to overlook it.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Rhodes Scholar Jonah Lehrer. All I’m saying.

  4. Malaclypse says:

    “Love is the only happiness that lasts. It is the opposite of underwear. It is the antithesis of chocolate cake.”

    Somewhere, both Jonah Goldberg and Jim Hoft are reading those sentences, and congratulating themselves for, finally, not writing the stupidest thing on the internet.

  5. bspencer says:

    Love always lasts, huh? Then why did I give up on *mumbletymumble* when they totally SOLD OUT, MAN?

    • Malaclypse says:

      You know, I want to be all emo and yell “No! Everybody dies! Love dies! There is no Sky Faerie! Grow the fuck up, and realize you will die, alone, like everybody does!”

  6. bspencer says:

    Suddenly this gig feels completely justified.

  7. bspencer says:

    BTW, I am in love with this post’s title. That love is one that will surely last forever.

  8. DocAmazing says:

    What Lehrer fails to address is the fate of the people whose job it is to collect the recycling.

  9. Cheap Wino says:

    Bourbon is sort of a gray area.

    Well, more like a brown area. Delicious. . . bourbon, brownest of the brown liquors. . . so tempting!

  10. kgus says:

    Good God! You’re supposed to puke into garbage bins, not recycle bins. What kind of monster is he?

  11. Manta says:

    The point of the book is that plagiarism better than original prose.

  12. laura says:

    Love isn’t only a verb like a bunch of bands claimed in the 90s. It’s also a noun, and it can be an adjective, like “the love bug”. Love lasts and if it does it’s your last love. Can I get some money too?

  13. Erik Loomis says:

    A 65 page book proposal? Why?

    • comptr0ller says:

      I interpreted this to mean the book was 65 pages long.

      • Ann Outhouse says:

        Standard industry practice is a 2-3 page synopsis and 2-3 sample chapters. I’m guessing that’s what this means. I doubt Lehrer has the cachet to get an advance based on a synopsis or pitch meeting alone.

        • PhoenixRising says:

          Yeah, but the implication is that 3 sample chapters were each 20 pages long. And 250 pages, if the excerpt above is indicative of their quality, could cause night blindness and hairy palms in an otherwise healthy individual.

          This is a prank.

    • BigHank53 says:

      Maybe if the book was titled How to Profit Through Tenditiousness, which looks like it might be a good subtitle for everything Jonah Lehrer writes, ever.

    • Vance Maverick says:

      Lehrer is a graphomaniac. When he felt like emitting this…thing to the publisher, 65 pages is just what he had.

  14. Elijah Craig says:

    What’s this about bourbon being a gray area?

  15. Ann Outhouse says:

    Back when I was in the book biz in the 70s, the big NY houses loved to pump out this narcissistic faux-redemption drama queen dribble penned by some disgraced upper-West-Side cocktail circuit weenie or another that no one outside their social set heard of or cares about. All of it went straight to the remainder bin back then, but it was a way to help out their unemployed writer friends with some nice advance money that should have gone to more deserving writers.

    Obviously, the culture has not changed one bit. E-book self-publishing can’t put these fuckers out of business soon enough, as far as I’m concerned.

  16. Slocum says:

    What the fuck does this mean? “I feel the shiver of a voice mail message,”

    Now we know why he resorted to plagiarism.

  17. herr doktor bimler says:

    Love is also totally the polar opposite of spray-on tans
    N__B may well have some views on this.

  18. Malaclypse says:

    Dear Simon and Schuster Forum,

    I never thought I’d be writing to you, but then one day I found myself vomiting into a recycling bin. This taught me things about the art of love best left unwritten, but I don’t get paid unless somebody writes something, so here goes…

  19. Pierre Menard says:

    Dear Simon & Schuster,
    You may be interested in my book proposal…

  20. Julia Grey says:

    He’s not just “shopping” it to Simon and Schuster with this proposal? They actually read the thing and then BOUGHT the book?

    Holy gaud.

    I say it and I say it (especially when trying to warn clients that they won’t become overnight sensations on the NYT fiction list), but I try not to really believe it until I can’t avoid getting smacked in the face once again with something like this.

    Publishing today is completely, utterly, incomprehensibly Fido Uniform.

    “The opposite of underwear”? “The antithesis of chocolate cake”? How about “the flip side of coherence”?

  21. ChrisTS says:

    “Love is the only happiness that lasts. It is the opposite of underwear. It is the antithesis of chocolate cake.”

    Well that made me feel a definite wave of nausea, so he’s got that talent.

  22. Froley says:

    Thesis: love
    Antithesis: chocolate cake
    Synthesis: liberal fascism

  23. ChrisTS says:

    I kind of get the ‘love is the opposite of cake’ thing, because you eat the cake and it’s over with (unless you are an idiot who lets her new mother in law persuade her that she simply must freeze a piece of the wedding cake for the 1st anniversary and then forgets about it for 3 years until the power goes down for a week. But, I don’t to talk about that.)

    But, underwear? I mean, that usually lasts for a while, in my experience. (Unless you accidentally burn it. But I don’t want to talk about that either.)

    So, is he eating his underwear?

  24. Haystack says:

    I’m gonna stick with the classics.

  25. ParallelH says:

    I was never too upset about the “self-plagiarism” part of the scandal initially, because it wasn’t clear to me if he was trying to pass off old world as new work, or just sloppy about how he was referencing his old work in trying to build upon it.

    And then came the rest of it . . ., the misquotes, the fabrications, the outright plagiarism from other authors. I believe in second chances, (in many chances actually), but I think those chances aren’t necessarily in the field one has squandered their reputation in. I think he deserves a chance to make a living, but he seems to have an unhealthy relationship with writing (in that he seems to have a hard time being honest in how he goes about it), so maybe writing is not the field he should expect to be welcomed back into with open arms. This isn’t the only kind of work he can do, and writing a big sappy book seems like either a clueless or cynical way to try and win back readers who are not stupid and don’t trust him anymore.

    IMO, he should probably just walk away and find something he’s better suited for.

    Although it makes me think, what, if anything, could he do to restore his reputation as an author? People don’t really seem inclined to forgive these kinds of mistakes.

    • ChrisTS says:

      The fact that he seems to be engaging in the same misbehaviors with this new effort suggests there is no hope and that he deserves no further chances as a writer.

  26. jim, some guy in iowa says:

    is the world really ready for foreigner’s big comeback?

    “i wanna know what love is,
    i want you to show –
    gaaaaacccckkkk – “

  27. Todd says:

    A Million Little Pieces of Cake

  28. Ronan says:

    So you’re all agin romantic love now? Sheesh

  29. HP says:

    The rise of Jonah Lehrer is something I just don’t get. I first encountered his writing when he was just another blogger on ScienceBlogs. At the time, he was writing about music cognition, and I tried engaging with him in the comments about some questions I had about methodology, and he just didn’t care. His posts starting getting longer and longer and more and more banal, and I lost interest and quit reading. Then he started selling stories to Big Media publications, publishing books, and getting all kinds of kudos, and I thought, “Did he suddenly become engaging and interesting?”

    Sadly, no! His articles for major publications turned out to be just as banal and personality-free as anything he turned out on his blog. And yet, on many science- and geek-oriented forums, he’s still considered to be a “good writer,” despite his ethical lapses. I’m just not seeing it. I can only imagine that his defenders (who are numerous) don’t actually read things.

    • ChrisTS says:

      Or, they don’t care about science, or they don’t care about writing, or they don’t care about ethics. So, yeah.

      • Ann Outhouse says:

        In all seriousness, what often gets otherwise mediocre writers ahead in the writing game, especially column-writing, is reliability. They turn in the required word count by deadline like clockwork and they don’t squeal when the editor butchers their baby with changes. So they become the editor’s darlings and can do no wrong, until the shortcuts they take to make deadlines catch up with them.

  30. Joey Maloney says:

    I wanna know what love is. I want you to show me.

  31. thelogos says:

    Linking him to She Who Is Not To Be Named is either a commercial ploy with the horrible Boomer patchouli set, or a long-con on those with fewer 2 brain cells to rub together. Well played.

  32. Heron says:

    Jesus. Who are this man’s parents that so many rich folks are willing to continue paying him for his writing in spite of repeated misconduct?

  33. drkrick says:

    So there was an unused extra verse to MacArthur Park.

  34. I in addition to my friends were found to be looking at
    the nice techniques on your website and so suddenly I got an
    awful suspicion I never expressed respect to the web site owner for those tips.
    All of the women came so happy to study them and have in effect actually been loving those things.
    We appreciate you turning out to be so helpful and
    also for pick out some tremendous subject matter millions
    of individuals are really needing to understand about.

    My personal sincere apologies for not expressing gratitude to earlier.

  35. A lot of thanks for all your hard work on this blog.

    My daughter loves doing investigation and it is obvious why.
    Many of us know all concerning the dynamic way you produce
    vital steps via this web blog and therefore recommend response from other individuals on that
    idea and our favorite daughter is really discovering a lot.

    Enjoy the remaining portion of the year. Your carrying out a great job.

  36. I would like to convey my respect for your kind-heartedness in support of all those that
    have the need for guidance on this important theme. Your real dedication to passing the solution across
    appears to be exceptionally productive and have without exception enabled professionals just like me
    to reach their pursuits. Your amazing warm and friendly
    guide denotes a great deal a person like me and far more
    to my office workers. Thanks a lot; from each one
    of us.

    Feel free to surf to my blog post: Gartengestaltung

  37. I really like what you guys are usually up too. This
    kind of clever work and exposure! Keep up
    the amazing works guys I’ve added you guys to blogroll.

    my weblog: veneers köln

  38. My husband and i were quite contented that Peter could do his
    inquiry out of the ideas he got when using the web pages.
    It is now and again perplexing just to find yourself releasing techniques the others
    might have been trying to sell. And we all grasp we have got you to be grateful to for this.
    The entire illustrations you’ve made, the simple web site menu, the relationships you can help foster – it’s
    got all great, and it’s really letting our son in addition to our family reason why that theme is satisfying, and that’s truly vital.
    Thank you for the whole thing!

  39. […] Most of you probably haven’t heard of Margaret Wente, who I think Canadian journalism received in exchange for Charles Krauthammer and a hack to be named later.  Anyway, I’m afraid it would take someone with much greater wisdom than I to determine which of these columns is more revolting: “there are too many transgender kids nowadays, please eliminate as many as possible, I am not a crackpot” or “Philip Seymour Hoffman is an asshole who had it coming.” And wait, it gets better — she’s being paid to write these atrocious columns despite being uncovered as a serial plagiarist, so she’s sort of a cross between Jonah Goldberg and Jonah Lehrer. […]

  40. Those that like to drink bottles of water could save horsebox insurance a
    lot of risk where as in equity release products.

  41. […] Lehrer somehow managed to get a publishing house to buy his stoned boarding-school-dorm musings (Thesis of book as described by author: “Love is the only happiness that lasts. It is the opposite of underwear. It is the […]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.