Breaking! Must Credit Daily Tucker! Democratic Woman Has Breasts!
Jesus Christ, what a pathetic operation Tucker Carlson is operating.
- Dave Brockington
- Paul Campos
- Erik Loomis
- Robert Farley
- SEK
- Scott Lemieux
- Website
- CV
- Wishlist
- Blog Posts
- Blogroll
- Whiskey Fire
- Unqualified Offerings
- Well Timed Period
- The Talking Dog
- The Sideshow
- The Mahablog
- The Comics Curmudgeon
- SCOTUSblog
- Sadly No
- Rob Neyer
- Puck Prospectus
- No More Mr. Nice Blog
- Making Light
- Julian Sanchez
- Hit and Run
- Hendrik Hertzberg
- Glenn Kenny
- Faux Real Tho
- Charles Pierce
- Carrie Brownstein
- Balkinization
- Alicublog
- ACSBlog
- 11D
- My Other Blogs
- B. Spencer
- Dave Noon
- DJW
-
-
-
-
-
Links
Las Vegas Personal Injury Attorney
Sarasota Law Firms
Need Cash? Sky Loans can
help you! quick and easy money loans.
Bridging Loans-
Recent Comments
- Kingfish on …and she had a Pandora bracelet!
- Peter on Stop Oppressing Men, Meanie Skeptic Women!
- STH on Stop Oppressing Men, Meanie Skeptic Women!
- Jamie on Stop Oppressing Men, Meanie Skeptic Women!
- Hogan on …and she had a Pandora bracelet!
- justaguy on Stop Oppressing Men, Meanie Skeptic Women!
- Ronan on …and she had a Pandora bracelet!
- Woodrowfan on …and she had a Pandora bracelet!
- justaguy on Stop Oppressing Men, Meanie Skeptic Women!
- DocAmazing on Stop Oppressing Men, Meanie Skeptic Women!
-
Recent Posts
- Stop Oppressing Men, Meanie Skeptic Women!
- …and she had a Pandora bracelet!
- A World Less Evil
- Weekend Beer Notes
- “Strike raises crop of stubble, cuts, safety-razors.”
- Capital Mobility and Corporate Whitewashing
- Mother of a Honky Tonk Girl
- Today In Not Notably Rational People Paid to Write About Politics
- The same old story is still the same old story
- Did Michael Kinsley Invent the Concept of Same-Sex Marriage?
Tags
2008 democratic primary 2012 Republican Primary academia barack obama baseball bloggingheads books china civil liberties constitutional interpretation constitutional law education environment film food football foreign policy free dahlia lithwick gay and lesbian rights hacktacular health care human rights iran i see dead people kentucky labor libya military procurement movies music NCAA football nonsense nukes Obama administration racism reproductive freedom russia Sarah Palin soccer Supreme Court the arbitrary executive The War On (Some Classes of People Who Use Some) Drugs This Day in Labor History wingnuttery Yuck the FankeesMeta
-
Awards
Paul Campos, Above the Law 2011 Lawyer of the Year
Erik Loomis, HNN Cliopatria 2011 Best Series of Posts
-
-
LGM Store
Make Custom Gifts at CafePressWho are We?
For administrative, advertising, or other inquiries, please e-mail here.
-
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- June 2004
blogroll
-
It’s a sign of how anxious the right wing is about the possibility that Ashley Judd might run for Senate …
I’m sorry, but if this is true, they’re even dumber than I thought. Best of luck to AJ and all, but she doesn’t have a chance.
Also, this is the Daily Caller. Their entire job is just to fling shit at any Democrat in sight.
Funny you should say that…
rats, you beat me to it!
Yes, being against motherhood probably does rule out a political career. No word on her opinion of apple pie yet.
Shorter Daily Caller: “We saw your boobs.”
Yes it is, and all I have to say about it is
Keep digging asshats! Please!
Would it be improper to gay bait the Daily Tucker? ironically of course.
I don’t know if it’d be improper, but it might well be dangerous
i have a suspicion that ms. judd is probably acquainted with a large stuntman or two, who’d be happy to crush carlson’s head against a wall. not that there’d be much to crush, carlson isn’t exactly known for his intellectual heft, or heft at all.
Scratch an ironic homophobe and all you scrape away is the irony.
Wait, we can make this work. You want to use homophobia to attack sexists, right? Next we can use racism to drive away the homophobes, then import gorillas to eat the racists. When wintertime rolls around, the racist-eating gorillas simply freeze to death.
We can handle the gorillas.
+1
I was thinking more like some good old fashioned Tucker level (i.e. junior high) trolling on a “why do you have a problem with boobs, Tucker?” track. Ought to have them tying themselves in knots for, what, weeks?
(And obviously that’s wholly unserious, but what the fuck else are you supposed to do with Tucker? Take him SERIOUSLY?!?!)
Snap his bowtie and steal his lunch money?
Christ, that’s offensive.
“Even the President of the United States must sometimes have to stand naked”.
+1
Come on Tucker, if I knew about this article I could have expensed my latest subscription
:(
What’s amazing is that the Daily Caller was able to find two staff members (Taylor Bigler and Matthew Boyle) who make Jim Treacher look sober and incisive in comparison. That takes some doing.
Treach is just so bitter and hateful that it suppresses his cognitive functions, while Bigler and Boyle are first-class morons.
Also too: the GOP is really fucking afraid of Ashely Judd, ain’t dey?
“But will Judd be the first potential senator who has — literally — nothing left to show us? The actress has bared her breasts in several films and has had some raunchy sex scenes in others.”
How soon they forget Scott Brown.
Not to mention, Governator Ahnold (for whom they wanted to overturn that pesky no-president-not-born-here thing, until they discovered he wasn’t wingnutty enough).
No, no, Ashley showed her boobs, and probably other assorted ladyparts as well. Don’t you know that it’s different for girls?
You’re all the same
This thread is for the Austrailian Men’s Rugby Team
God bless all women via Maria !!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWLfZ2c9Sg0
Not clicking in it, unless it’s a video on how to make perfect pancakes.
The most pathetic thing about it is that they outsource their reporting to Mr. Skin, as if it were the Congressional Record or something. Here’s an idea: Do the actual hard work of watching “Bug” on Netflix Streaming, and tell us what you see. Shoe-leather reporting!
So it’s OK to surf porn sites at that job and the boss publishes your results?
But then they would have to fast forward to the “good” parts, which would mean switching hands.
These idiots wouldn’t make it through 30 minutes of that film (which is great, by the way). Much less make it all the way to Ms. Judd’s nude scene, which, I might add, is definitely among the least erotic nude scenes in all of cinema.
Eh. The Caller’s content seems to be created largely by a mill of conservative graduates in their early 20′s being paid minimum wage. It is pathetic, but it’s hard for me to get upset over any particular article, or pretend that an intern is anything but because they’ve been given the title “Entertainment Editor.”
Your inability to “get upset” over sexist double-standards has been noted. Thanks.
As has your level of reading comprehension. Thanks.
No, I’ve checked. Interpretation stands. Good on you, though, for rising above the misogyny and forgiving the little dears, they know not what they do.
I don’t think that’s actually what he did, though.
Chatham said he can’t get upset about this because the author is probably young and ignorant. That ignorance is pathetic, agreed, but it’s also harmful. Sexist double standards hurt people and therefore merit some anger. Posting this yawn indicates both that he doesn’t care and that he thinks we shouldn’t care, which is wrong.
No, I said it’s hard for me to get upset about any particular article mostly because this is par for the course with the The Daily Caller. Similar to how it’s hard for me to get upset about any particular news piece on Townhall, the latest hysterics from Ann Coulter or the postings of our resident troll. Sure, the individual pieces are offensive, but that’s because these outlets are set up to be factories of offense.
Take it as a yawn if you will, but pieces like this are endemic, not outliers, and the reason for that is because that’s how places like The Caller are set up.
“Hysterics”
“Pancakes.”
“Self-parody”
If they were true conservatives they’d accept less than the minimum wage because something something free market.
I think they can go under minimum if Tucker sets up a tip jar associated with their postings
That crappy Daily Caller article isn’t even clear about what argument it’s trying to make. That’s probably because if the implicit argument was spelled out (Ashley Judd is a sex symbol, therefore she is a dumb bimbo unsuited for political office) people would realize it was a stupid, sexist non-sequitur.
Meh, it’s probably because the guy is the “Entertainment editor” at the Daily Caller and, as such, is a rung above “box of rocks” on the “how fucking dumb are you?” ladder.
Hey shut up!
My article would have been more nuanced.
if the implicit argument were spelled out, everyone would realize they’d just described every on-cam female on FOX.
“That’s probably because if the implicit argument was spelled out (Ashley Judd is a sex symbol, therefore she is a dumb bimbo unsuited for political office) people would realize it was a stupid, sexist non-sequitur.”
and let’s be serious here, who’s boobs do you want to see, ms. judd’s, or mitch mcconnell’s? it’s a trick question.
I’m familiar with John Cornyn; which one is the other boob?
John McCain, I believe.
Wow. I find myself unable to gin up any umbrage. This is just so remarkably stupid. Ashley Judd is an actress; she has done nude scenes. I just can’t figure out how this is a story.
It’s a story because the very idea that a Senator’s breasts might have featured in a motion picture is an unprecedented* insult to the solemn dignity and unimpeachable moral standards of the greatest deliberative body in the history of the world.
*Yes, yes, Henry Cabot Lodge’s appearances in D.W. Griffith’s ill-fated forays into adult film. Fine.
Just be glad Henry Hyde’s youthful indiscretions didn’t involve the same.
or Strom Thurmond’s
I just vomited a little.
Scott Brown did show us some boob, not to mention some partial pube, but as I said, it’s different for girls…
don’t we, all want the same thing? Don’t we?
Who said anything about love?
You can’t “show boob” when you “are boob.”
Sure you can. You just go outside.
it adds a new dimension to side boob
I suppose this could be seen as a sign of progress on the part of Tucker. He used to be horrified at the very idea of a woman running for office because she is a woman with breasts. Now he is horrified at the idea of a woman running for office because he or someone else has seen confirmation on film that the woman has breasts.
Remember when the very thought of Hillary Clinton caused him to clutch his genitals?
What genitals?
BREASTS ISREAL.
Speaking of boobs…
It just never effing stops.
Keep it up asshats. Show us who you are.
What the fuck was that?
Shorter: Stupid fratboy says don’t be a stupid fratboy.
That was my exact reaction.
Remind me again, how is the rebooted New Republic an improvement? Is this an example of their revivified love of “long-form journalism”?
What in the absolute actual fuck? Did someone mess up the publication copy for TNR and Playboy or something?
Someone confused “Vicky Cristina Barcelona” with real life. And apparently thinks he’s Javier Bardem.
Edmund Wilson is probably spinning so fast, a warp field is starting to form around Talcottville, NY……………….
um, wow! i mean, just, wow.
Let’s get real here. Any operation that would even hire Tucker is pathetic by definition. We need a whole new word fro an operation he actually runs.
Lighten up. You’d overreact to naked women in the movies too if you’d never seen one in real life.
if you want to see this in real life, go down to bourbon street, on any warm night.
You’d overreact to naked women in the movies too if you’d never seen one in real life.
Bourbon Street terrifies Tucker and his minions. They might see naughty bits and blahs!
The analysis really seems more than the DC’s trollish efforts deserve.