Shuster
I was on David Shuster’s show last week talking about the late unpleasantness. Shuster named me “Activist of the Week,” so that was pretty cool. Unfortunately, I really managed to garble some wording here, but I’m no professional. Although it is actually kind of like my teaching style, where I stumble around with words for the first 5 seconds before going on in a coherent and driven way for the next 7 minutes. Also, the lighting in my in-laws’ basement makes me look really bald. It’s the lighting, I swear.
rea:
January 2nd, 2013 at 12:00 pm
You could have borrowed Farley’s hat–he wasnt using it . . .
Erik Loomis:
January 2nd, 2013 at 12:01 pm
He’s been trying to convince me of the necessity of hats for years now.
J. Otto Pohl:
January 2nd, 2013 at 12:28 pm
This is somewhat off topic, but what happened to the This Day in Labor History Post dealing with the 2 January 1905 Chicago conference which helped plan the 27 June 1905 conference founding the IWW? Did I miss it somehow?
Bijan Parsia:
January 2nd, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Congrats!
Erik Loomis:
January 2nd, 2013 at 1:00 pm
Are you chiding me for not writing the posts you want me to write?
zombie rotten mcdonald:
January 2nd, 2013 at 1:04 pm
I always have difficulty taking Shuster seriously because he looks so much like Jimmy Kimmel, and I keep expecting Ben Stein or Adam Carolla to pop in….
J. Otto Pohl:
January 2nd, 2013 at 1:18 pm
No chiding, just wondering why there is not a post about this event in labor history.
Uncle Ebeneezer:
January 2nd, 2013 at 4:01 pm
Shrill! ;)
Hogan:
January 2nd, 2013 at 4:04 pm
He may have some higher priorities at the end of the fall semester and the onset of the winter holidays than writing labor history posts for LGM.
J. Otto Pohl:
January 2nd, 2013 at 4:24 pm
There is always time for solidarity. ;-)
Peter Hovde:
January 3rd, 2013 at 11:49 am
Your interview persona is so much less contentious than your blogging persona.
Peter Hovde:
January 3rd, 2013 at 11:50 am
“Contentious” being, for me, a compliment.