Subscribe via RSS Feed

In Case You Missed Tonight’s Beatdown

[ 95 ] October 11, 2012 | Scott Lemieux

Shorter Paul Ryan: “Lie. Evasion. Non-sequitur. Anecdote about someone from middle America substantially less coherent and relevant than Abraham Simpson at his most rambling. Overrule Roe v. Wade.”

Shorter Joe Biden: “Every obvious rejoinder Barack Obama inexplicably failed to make, in addition to some additional good lines.”

In an ideal universe, some journalists might figure out that International Man of Ideas Paul Ryan — who embarrassed himself in a way even Palin didn’t — is not particularly bright or well-informed.

Comments (95)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. wengler says:

    These things are such shitfests.

    At least Ryan isn’t being squishy about abortion. If only a talented Democratic politician believed there was a constituency of people out there who want to keep control of their bodies.

  2. Decrease Mather says:

    I didn’t watch so I confess I’m skeptical it was this bad/good. Really? Did Joe swear?

  3. jeer9 says:

    Who was that moderator? I could only tolerate a few minutes, but she seemed particularly well-informed about Social Security and Medicare.

    • bobbyp says:

      She prefaces a question about how we all “know Social Security and Medicare are going broke” and this is somehow “well informed”. That doesn’t pass the smell test.

      • Ni Hao Lao Wai says:

        Raddatz was what you want in a moderator, though. Willing to let the candidates crosstalk to an extent, but iron fisted about changing the topic.

        Jim Lehrer should take a lesson when he wants to steal a debate spot from a woman or a minority in 2016.

        • Warren Terra says:

          She handled the candidates well – but some of her questions were really, really awful. “Mr. Vice President, please respond to the following line of rhetoric from Romney’s stump speech about the stimulus failing, served up as if it were gospel truth” is not a good question.

      • Ed says:

        She prefaces a question about how we all “know Social Security and Medicare are going broke”

        She also seems to have no problem with people hanging on till 70 for their benefits, asking Biden why raising the age as Ryan wants is such a bad idea. (I wasn’t totally happy with Biden’s response, either.)

        • jeer9 says:

          I heard that remark as well, which is why I only stayed a few minutes. With such a well-informed moderator, it was clear that Village bubbles would not be disturbed much.

          On the other hand, the evening was not a total loss. O’s go to a fifth game after the Giants sweep three.

  4. lurker says:

    the village is already preparing to treat Biden like Al Gore.

    • laura says:

      No politician will be treated like Al Gore again until their party has been in control of the White House for at least eight years and the economy is in good shape.

      • gmack says:

        I think this is right. Besides, there’s a difference between smiling/laughing and sighing. Biden looked like he was enjoying himself.

        In any case, I’m kind of with wengler on this. I find this whole exercise to be utterly embarrassing. We have VP debate and the very first thing that PBS–the “serious news source”–wants to talk about is not anything anyone actually said, but whether “independents” will be turned off about Joe Biden smiling too much.

    • Joe Biden says:

      *SMIRK*

      *SMILE*

      *SIGH*

      • wengler says:

        *KICKS RYAN’S ASS*

        *REFLECTS*

        *SMILES*

      • spencer says:

        So Biden smiling is a problem, but Romney smiling in his debate isn’t, because shut up that’s why?

        Gotcha.

        • Cody says:

          Also Biden was very rude, but Romney was just in control. You know, interrupting the President to tell him a liar is much meaner than smiling and laughing while the other guy… speaks less candidly then he should.

  5. wengler says:

    Ryan looks like a fucking moron.

  6. Mayur says:

    Martha Raddatz is fucking awesome.

    Tyson vs. Bambi is pretty much how it is.

    • somethingblue says:

      Goodness. I’m very surprised to hear that after reading Ezra Klein’s enthusiastic blow job admiring tribute to Ryan the Debater this morning.

  7. wengler says:

    Ryan wasn’t really able to push much beyond his talking points.

    Still though, fuck these ‘debates’. The only purpose they serve is to show us how fucked we are.

  8. Mayur says:

    And BTW I think Ryan stuck out his neck for the chopping block. Biden couldn’t go after Palin like this because (a) female and (b) total idiot without pretensions of policy chops. Ryan was asking for it.

  9. Offsides says:

    I intentionally avoided the debate and took my wife out to dinner. Now coming back and checking blogs. YEEEEEEHAAAAAAAA!

    The facts were obviously on Biden’s side but he drove them home. Now, the question is if Obama can adapt to Biden’s approach instead of trying to be Mr. Above-the-fray.

  10. Bill Maher’s tweet summed it up nicely: “Hello 9 1 1? There s an old man beating a child on my tv”

  11. PhoenixRising says:

    The key moment was Uncle Joe pointing out to Lil Paul that, um, we want Afghan soldiers to defend the government of Afghanistan’s positions in the most dangerous area of the globe–not US soldiers. It’s just that simple. Yes, we’re drawing down, because it’s not our damn job.

    I needed a drink and a cigarette.

    • Cody says:

      Biden spent the whole foreign policy exchange trying to get Ryan to say what he means – I want to send more Americans to die in foreign wars.

      Ryan just kept saying “you withdraw troops” and Biden kept saying “So you want to send more in?”

      The whole exchange was embarrassing for Ryan. Clearly just dodging and dodging his true opinion, because it’s not popular to say you want to send more Americans to war. Yet it’s perfectly cool to accuse the other person of not sending enough.

  12. Anonymous says:

    The Biden laughing and smirking will be the 2012 Al Gore sighs.

    Biden lost. Big time. A condescending, senile, fat, arrogant jerk-off.

  13. Colin says:

    That didn’t stop Luke Nepotism Russertnfrom tweeting that Biden brought “emotion” and RyN brought “facts.” Seriously.

  14. Warren Terra says:

    Can Farley or one of the other naval history buffs here explain what the flip is up with Romney’s (and Romney-Ryan’s) insistence that we need a bigger navy? According to some numbers I could easily Google a couple of weeks ago, the US Navy has something like 80% of the world’s naval tonnage, and our very closest allies (the UK, Germany, France, Canada, Australia) combine for another 10-15%. I’m sure we could have all sorts of fascinating discussions about the relative merits of battleships, or how our navy should be composed for the missions of today and the future. But the idea that we can’t afford for the Navy to be smaller, when it outmasses any conceivable naval opponent by around 20-to-one, seems flat insane.

    • SpiderBat says:

      It’s not 80%, but it’s high. The figure I’ve always heard is that the USN equals the tonnage of the next thirteen navies (of which eightish are allies).

      John “600-ship Navy” Lehman blathered about what they want recently. The big additions are a) a new FFG to replace the Perrys =and b) a Kirov-sized BMD ship, built around an amphib (LPD-17) hull. Because apparently, not only do we want to build ships for the sole purpose of flinging $30 million interceptors at decoy balloons, we want those ships to be too slow to keep up with a Carrier Group.

      • witless chum says:

        You’re making that ballistic missile shit up! Tell me your making that up. Fucks sake!

      • Unsympathetic says:

        The CG-X (what you called the BMD) program was cancelled in 2010.. the new plan is to refurbish the Arleigh Burke class instead.

        The LCS (what you called the new FFG) is the replacement for the Oliver Hazard Perry class, which has been scheduled for decommissioning for a while.. the Perry has been around since the 70′s.

    • RhZ says:

      But the Chinese have a carrier now!!1!

      Coincidentally, right after Farley blogged about how it, I saw they have already included it in a stupid video montage for the National Day which just passed on Oct 1st. No time wasted getting use out of that thing!

  15. SEK says:

    The Corner is a den of hilarity at the moment.

  16. laura says:

    Mostly I am relieved for Andrew Sullivan. This will probably add at least a year to his life.

  17. Joe says:

    Since Obama’s debate performance caused so many people to wet their pants (let’s prepare for President Romney!), will this calm some down, or will only possible man bites dog moments be focused upon?

  18. Quercus says:

    Boston Globe’s headline “Ryan shows electorate he’s no pushover in VP debate”.

    In an ideal universe, journalists would have spent the last couple of months informing voters about the parties’ and candidates’ likely actual policy actions, and would now be spending their time looking for other things to inform people about, but in THIS universe editors are demanding political stories and who wants to write stories about a not-very-close campaign (or, God, worse, actual public policy)?

    • mds says:

      Boston Globe’s headline “Ryan shows electorate he’s no pushover in VP debate”.

      I’m sure that’s out of a sense of fairness, in order to be symmetrical with last week’s headline “Obama holds his own in first debate,” right? Because I was beginning to wonder if Vice President Biden had learned that Paul Ryan was secretly his red-haired stepchild.

      I mean, really. I know they tried to make Sarah Palin into the clear winner of the last VP debate, and Lord knows that Dubya not obviously soiling himself on stage was a knockout victory, but really. “No pushover”? Because he didn’t suddenly stop lying after the first twenty-six times his lies were shredded in front of his pasty, vacuous face? Because he didn’t collapse sobbing and immediately withdraw from the race after Joe Biden demonstrated that Paul Ryan couldn’t find Afghanistan on a map of Afghanistan? Or did the headline get composed on an iPhone, and autocorrected to “no pushover” from “no shame”?

      Oh, well, back to everyone else in the mainstream media focusing exclusively on Biden’s rude demeanor. I suppose this is a bit of a backhanded reassurance about last week’s debate: Obama could have brilliantly refuted Romney’s lies repeatedly, and it would have meant fuck-all, because just look at how he tied his goddamn shoes.

      • actor212 says:

        No, I’m going to have to go with the Globe on this: Ryan was no pushover.

        I mean, lookit, he pronounced Afghanistan correctly no less than five times, and actually remembered we had been in a war in Iraq.

        He reminded me of the kid who studied for his final for about an hour, tossed the textbook down to play with his X box, then figured he could bullshit his way through the essay.

  19. I’m terrible about judging these things. I though it was a tie, with Biden winning very slightly, up until Ryan’s superior closing.

    Then again, I thought McCain won the first debate in 2008, so don’t ask me.

    A beatdown, eh?

    • calling all toasters says:

      In so, so many ways. On foreign policy, he created the impression he wants to stay in Afghanistan forever while admitting he didn’t disagree with the timeline, which he also thinks “sends the wrong signal.” Huh to the what on that. Raddatz really drew him out on abortion, Syria, and Iran, where he looked extreme and dangerous. And he looked like the cynical politician on Medicare (Biden played the “which party do you trust?” card well) and on the stimulus (big “gotcha!” by Joe the B.). The only thing that went his way is that he took his beating well, keeping his composure and humor.

      • actor212 says:

        And let’s not forget that he told a story about a tragic car accident that Mitt Romney helped with the aftermath of¹.

        To Joe Biden, who lost his first wife in one, and deftly turned the tables on Ryan.

        ¹ Said accident involving a parishoner in the good bishop’s church. Romney paid the college tuition of the guy’s son(s?). Which is really nice until you remember he had a religious obligation to assist the members of his flock. Also, Ryan raised the $30 million in charitable giving, deftly sidestepping that if he hadn’t tithed, Mitt would be excommunicated.

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

  • Switch to our mobile site