Subscribe via RSS Feed

Apple’s Record in China

[ 26 ] January 10, 2012 | Erik Loomis

The Institute of Environmental and Public Health, a Beijing non-profit, has listed Apple as the lowest ranked of the 29 companies it surveyed for issues of responsiveness and transparency of health and environmental concerns in China.

Now it’s hard to say what kind of methodology was used by this group, particularly given what I assume is the hostility of the Chinese government to publicizing this information. Apple’s defenders will say it is being picked on because of its visibility. And possibly this there is some truth to this, not in the big picture but in relation to other corporations. The real issue here is that measuring these factors is nearly impossible because of the complete lack of transparency within supplier companies. That is the responsibility of multinational corporations and governments. Apple, Wal-Mart, and whoever else use contracted suppliers in part to save costs, but also to shield themselves from blame when workers get sick or die or when the factories pollute an entire ecosystem. And yet they are at least as morally and materially guilty as the supply companies since they demand the goods at extremely low prices. Apple could easily step up to the plate, reveal all its suppliers, investigate conditions, ensure healthful workplaces and dignified wages. But then its top executives might have to give up that ivory backscratcher they wanted for Christmas.

You can download the full report on the linked website, but it is in Chinese.

…..But at least Apple workers in China are forced to sign pacts to not commit suicide.

Comments (26)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. c u n d gulag says:

    Well, in all fairness, suicide can really fuck-up productivity for a while.

  2. Bijan Parsia says:

    The really bizarre thing is that Apple has enormous profit margins. Staggering. That’s their big thing. When they sell through the online store or an Apple Store it’s even larger.

    They don’t do dividends, by and large. So why not spend more on labor?

    It’s pretty weird.

  3. Auguste says:

    But, but, Steve Jobs!

  4. Amanda in the South Bay says:

    Suicide is revolutionary and just works.

  5. Adara says:

    Ugh the report is depressing. The (sort of standard for mainland publications) alarmist play to the emotions style is managing to do a number on me because the subject matter is really sad :(

  6. wengler says:

    Apple products should be the new blood diamonds.

  7. HonorableBob says:

    So, how many of the bloggers and also the commenters here have Apple products?

    HHmmmmmmm???

    Economics is a social science and all about behavior and let’s face it, when it comes down to it, none of this has stopped you from buying thier products.

    If the iPhone were made in America with EPA and unions involved, you couldn’t afford it.

    • Anonymous says:

      Speak for yourself. May come as a shock to you, but some of us have no Apple products.

    • c u n d gulag says:

      I also have no Apple products.
      I wish I could.
      But I can’t even afford the shit they make overseas.
      Oh, did I just bust a meme for you, DishonorableBob?

      Go back to FOX, or Rush, or Glenn – I’m sure they’ll be more than happy to sell you some more talking points bullshit.

      • HororableBob says:

        Hey, just cuz yer a broke-dick doesn’t mean every one is. Look around.

        Better still, ask the bloggers if they have Apple products. Teachers luv Apple.

        • Njorl says:

          I just don’t see the attraction of Apple products. I swore them off the moment my iPod decided I was violating copyright protection on the pictures I took of my kids.

    • J. Otto Pohl says:

      I have never owned any Apple products. But, if they start making stuff cheap enough to afford say by manufacturing in Africa rather than China to save on transport costs maybe I would reconsider. Not to mention labor standards are a lot better here than in China.

    • Njorl says:

      Very little of what is necessary to produce an iPhone for the US market actually happens in China. The finished product gets shipped from China, so the full manufacturing costs (about $200 out of the $500 pricetag) get creditted to our trade with China. Apple does bear more cost, for advertising and shipping, but those are within the US already, for iPhones sold in the US.

      About $6.00 of the cost of the iPhone is incurred in China, though that number is increasing rapidly. Do you really think that if that work was done in the US, it would price the iPhone out of reach?

      The bulk of the money spent to make an iPhone is in Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Doing the work in Korea and Taiwan saves a little in cost. Doing work in Japan is more costly than doing it in the US, but it is more economical for logistical reasons.

      The profit margin on an iPhone is huge. This means that they are charging an optimal price right now which does not take production costs into account. Fairly significant increases in production cost will result in virtually no price increase at all. It is likely that if the iPhone were made entirely in the US, that the price would be about the same, but Apple’s profit would be much smaller.

      Production costs only affect price for lower tier products.

      • Njorl says:

        I checked and found some errors. Japan’s labor costs have dropped slightly below the US. Taiwan’s labor cost has dropped very rapidly in the last 15 years. If the bulk of the iPhone is made in Taiwan, then moving production to the US would have an effect on the final price, but would not price it out odf reach of consumers.

      • Njorl says:

        The low unit labor costs in Taiwan make something very clear. They aren’t moving operations to China from the US. They are moving them there from Taiwan. Apple builds the iPhone in China to save about $5.00 per unit. That $5.00 is all profit, with no effecct on price.

  8. [...] Apple's Record in China : Lawyers, Guns & Money Now it's hard to say what kind of methodology was used by this group, particularly given what I assume is the hostility of the Chinese government to publicizing this information. Apple's defenders will say it is being picked on … [...]

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

  • blogroll

  • Brad Delong
  • Crooked Timber
  • Daily Kos
  • Danger Room
  • Eschaton
  • Ezra Klein
  • Feministe
  • Talking Points Memo
  • Feministing
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Juan Cole
  • Monkey Cage
  • Switch to our mobile site