Do we, um, actually have any alien spacecraft?Q: From president to president, do you pass along a list of secrets - you know like where's Jimmy Hoffa? What really happened at Roswell? Without giving away any state secrets, is there something that we can all look...
Friday Cat Blogging. . . Lizardo
In my previous post, I discussed the question of judicial review versus judicial supremacy. The reason I bring this up is to address the arguments that John Roberts made as.
Via Think Progress:O’Reilly: The truth of the matter is our correspondents at Fox News can’t go out for a cup of coffee in Baghdad.Rice: Bill, that’s tough. It’s tough. But what — would they have wanted to have gone out for a cup of coffee when...
Ricky: "Uh, yes. Okay. The board."George: "I'm fucked on the board. I can't-- I can't-- See, I ca-- My mind must be on other places, 'cause I can't uh--"Ricky: "What?.
This is, of course, great news. What's annoying is that it will hardly dim the cries that the Massachusetts judiciary is composed of out-of-control "activists" who imposed their will on.
In the course of a conservation I've been having with an extremely smart lawyer about John Roberts' arguments about Article III, I've been trying to clarify some thoughts about judicial review and democracy. Before I get into that, however, it's worth emphasizing the distinction beteween two...
Professor B says: It seems reassuring to have Roberts say that he believes Roe to be settled law, and that he doesn't think that disagreeing with the logic of a.
Mad Melancholic Feminista recently wrote to ask about my earlier post arguing that overturning Roe would not, in fact, "return the issue to the states." Like many pro-choice activists, this.
Jesse Taylor noted a while back that since the success of Gibson's Passion, conservatives have been routinely trying to draw all sorts of lessons from box office receipts, and they've been doing a pretty damned inept job of it.In the continued effort to search for something,...
I can't go, but I'm sure some of you can. . .This week, we're going to move Drinking Liberally downtown, andincorporate a book signing. Chris Mooney, staff writer for the.
I disagree with John Ikenberry. I don't believe that Article 9 of the Japanese constitution serves any further purpose, and I think it should be abolished.Ikenberry's case is built around.