Even though as political scientist I'm duty-bound to note that tonight's festivities are unlikely to affect the election, I'm also looking forward to watching. I may chime in if there's.
(1) As a new blogger I'm clearly not aware of all internet traditions, as I didn't realize that deleting a post I had put up a couple of minutes earlier.
To follow-up on Adam's point here, the conservative project to separate the implied constitutional "right to privacy" from Roe v. Wade is longstanding. (I should note, contra to Ponnuru's fancy.
Jim Pinkerton and I recorded a diavlog last week; he asked a lot of good questions and let me do most of the talking. Unfortunately, we spoke before the Couric.
COURIC: Do you think there's an inherent right to privacy in the Constitution?PALIN: I do. Yeah, I do.COURIC: That's the cornerstone of Roe v WadePALIN: I do. And I believe.
Blogs of the year, every one!
Although I haven't seen it I understand there's a David Cronenberg movie in which people are subjected to telekinetic bombardment until their heads actually explode. If the increasingly unstable state.
The Romanovs were victims of political repression:Russia's Supreme Court has ruled that the last Tsar, Nicholas II, and his family were victims of political repression and should be rehabilitated.The rehabilitation.
- Lindsey Graham dies
- Argentina-Switzerland Game Thread
- Patel serves subpoenas on Times journalists for writing accurate but embarrassing story about Trump grift
- Norway-England Game Thread
- Trump administration stopped monitoring diarrhea parasite
- Week 77
- Just Keep it Simple?
- Statistics v. Reality: The murder rate
- Erik Visits a (Latin) American Grave, Part 2,181
- Possibility of beating Susan Collins officially reopens
