Author: Scott Lemieux
Via Matt W., the fact that the GOP has "progressed from 2000 where they refused to count Democratic votes, to 2008 where they are now refusing to count their own.
Yglesias points out the problems with Ambinder's claim that "Obama cannot win the states where the majority of Democrats reside": i.e. it's a more tendentious way of saying that "Clinton.
Ugh. Remember when installing an Islamist quasi-state in Iraq was defended as a boon to the interests of Iraqi women (oddly enough, usually by people otherwise hostile to women's rights?).
A valuable roundup. It's easy to understand why this kind of stuff pushes people into Clinton's camp.
I agree with Ezra that it would be unfortunate for the nomination to come down to superdelegates, and I would hope that there would be a norm among many superdelegates.
Jack Balkin points us to this article in the WSJ defending John McCain on the question of judicial appointments. Part of the op-ed consists of the usual vacuous buzzwords like.
I decided to watch the returns with the second-best commentariat in the blogosphere, which meant that I couldn't hear the speeches, etc. I think Yglesias gets the bottom line about.
Shorter Verbatim Hugh Hewitt: "McCain can't be considered a frontrunner by any conventional standard." Sure, keep telling yourself that and you'll...oh, actually, even he couldn't actually convince himself of that.
