Year: 2005
I had no idea this study has had such a long life in the blogosphere. The Continental Op, after following up on my post yesterday, read the paper (Prof. Groseclose has posted it on his website, so we
A commenter asked me what I thought about Orin Kerr’s analysis of the legality of Bush’s wiretaps. Kerr is a serious scholar, and I think his argument deserves a fair hearing; I also belie
Don’t believe me about whether FISA authorizes warrantless wiretaps? Well, you may want to ask our famously libertarian attorney general what he thinks: “Now, in terms of legal authorities
Kieran offers a taxonomy of bullshit-libertarian justifications for arbitrary executive power. The take on InstaCrocodileTears is particularly priceless: “Oh, puh-leeze. This is nothing new. It&
jedmunds at Pandagon comments on some of the apparent oddities in the UCLA study on Media Bias that has been embraced by, amongst others, our friend Jeff Goldstein. This deserves a longer post and a m
Two more excellent posts by Glenn Greenwald on the Bush’s Administration’s illegal searches. First, he finds Hugh Hewitt citing United States v. United States District Court (1972) on beha
Matt Bai. The problem with bad analogies and meaningless catchphrases is that they can conceal the fact–apparently even from the author–that the underlying arguments are just utterly illog
Shakes notes the latest emerging talking point, which will be to say that the Democrats approved of Bush’s illegal searches, so nobody can complain. Like Shakes, I’m pretty dubious about t
- Everything is Fine!
- William Barr is a disgusting fascist pig who makes John Mitchell look like Louis Brandeis
- This Day in Labor History: September 17, 1868
- Well don’t trust your soul to no backwoods southern lawyer
- LGM Film Club, Part 73: You Are On Indian Land
- George Atiyeh
- E Pluribus Something
- Donald Trump with a law degree
- Trump’s COVID catastrophe
- Big 10 Conference: Nothing is more important to us than the welfare of our serfs