Month: October 2004
Strikes me as some significant news: In an interview with the Financial Times, Mr Struck departed from his government’s resolve not to send troops to Iraq under any circumstances, saying: “At.
Academic security experts, that is. They have some, er, questions about the handling of the intervention in Iraq. Via Brad Delong comes this letter, signed by 698 scholars of international security..
A great point here by Michael Berube. While I understand that acknowledging the deeply-felt moral sense of people who oppose some abortions procured by the wrong kind of pe...er, "pro-lifers" is.
Julia at Sisyphus Shrugged nails it. Really, the Times should have suggested that the book would have been better with another year or twenty of research. But, then, and op-ed page.
I wade in only with great trepidation. . . Can you make a good film about a stone killer? Absolutely, no question. Can you make a good film about a.
Just to make a last quick point, I think this post at the (superb) Counterspin Central represents a fairly common misperception about the extent of Dred Scott's holding. Obviously, if the Court.
Rest in peace, Ken. Kids, be careful with the nose candy.
David Neiwert has an interesting post about the crucial Dred Scott issue (you heard it here first!) The general thrust of his argument is correct: when you hear "strict constructionism" it means.
